We performed a comparison between Aruba ClearPass and macmon Network Access Control based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Access Control (NAC) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features of Aruba ClearPass are its ease of use and the general network access controls."
"The most valuable features of Aruba ClearPass are the GUI and its ease-to-do configuration. Additionally, we can troubleshoot many things in one window."
"Aruba ClearPass has improved the security control in our network environment."
"The most valuable features of Aruba ClearPass are the authentication mechanisms and the integration with Active Directory(AD)."
"ClearPass's best feature is its comprehensiveness."
"Aruba ClearPass has complete NAC features."
"The most valuable feature is flexibility as it supports solutions from multiple vendors."
"ClearPass is effortless to use and configure. It's not hard to learn the tool, and it has lots of features."
"The API is a great way to get information from other tools."
"We use it with our Cisco switches so we can see which switch it is actually connected to."
"The ease of connecting with the client is valuable for me."
"ClearPass' interface could be more user-friendly."
"Aruba ClearPass could improve the complexity of the initial usage. It takes some time to be good at it. It's not simple to build and connect the rules to the network you want to deploy them on."
"Lacks the ability to handle more than one certificate for both the management process and the Captive Portal."
"The licensing model could be improved."
"The solution needs to upgrade its user interface. Right now, it's not so user friendly, and it's an aspect that my clients' wish was improved upon."
"The pricing policy could be more flexible."
"Instructions on adding layouts are not as clear as they could be."
"The technical support has some room for improvement. It takes them a long time to respond sometimes. I rate Aruba support six out of 10."
"The service macmon offers is already great."
"The solution must allow users to filter files based on dates."
"The single sign-on process can be improved and the interface should be made more user-friendly."
More macmon Network Access Control Pricing and Cost Advice →
Aruba ClearPass is ranked 2nd in Network Access Control (NAC) with 75 reviews while macmon Network Access Control is ranked 9th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 3 reviews. Aruba ClearPass is rated 8.6, while macmon Network Access Control is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Aruba ClearPass writes "Easy to use, multifeatured, and reliable policy management platform for identity authentication and new device onboarding". On the other hand, the top reviewer of macmon Network Access Control writes "A robust solution that provides protection to effectively control the access to your network". Aruba ClearPass is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiNAC, Forescout Platform, Microsoft Intune and ExtremeControl, whereas macmon Network Access Control is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiNAC and Forescout Platform. See our Aruba ClearPass vs. macmon Network Access Control report.
See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.