We performed a comparison between Aruba ClearPass and Portnox Clear based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Access Control (NAC) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The continuous server and posturing are valuable."
"The visibility and security features are most valuable. We get a clear view. It is a very secure product for educational institutions."
"I like the integration options with a multitude of other vendors and Aruba applications."
"Aruba has improved my organization because it supported me on my level of access."
"A mature and functional product."
"Stable with good QBT technology."
"We are able to satisfy many different organizational needs because of its flexibility."
"ClearPass is effortless to use and configure. It's not hard to learn the tool, and it has lots of features."
"The product's initial setup phase was straightforward."
"The solution has a valuable reporting feature."
"I like the fact that you can take your device anywhere and still have that visibility from anywhere because it's agent-based."
"In the next version, I would like to see some enhancement or extension on the tracking side. For example, when any user enters the network, it should be more visible in the graphical form."
"Aruba ClearPass has fewer deployment scenarios and flexibility than Forescout."
"Because some users use OS 10, it would be good if the solution could group its functions better."
"The interface could be made easier and more intuitive."
"The GUI of Aruba ClearPass could improve, it is not user-friendly."
"One area for improvement would be the possibility of using social media providers for user authentication."
"The solution should be more precise for VMs and allow for management of the entire system."
"The monitoring of Aruba ClearPass needs improvement. For example, they have monitoring for TECHx and you can find out what the administrator did. However, if Aruba ClearPass is managing GUI devices, you do not know what the administrator is doing."
"From a resource perspective, the OEM can do better in terms of resource utilization."
"As there are no agents in Portnox Clear, the customers of the product cannot download any agents on their devices, making them unsure if the product offers proper security."
"I believe there is a lot of room for improvement in terms of integration."
Aruba ClearPass is ranked 2nd in Network Access Control (NAC) with 75 reviews while Portnox Clear is ranked 12th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 3 reviews. Aruba ClearPass is rated 8.6, while Portnox Clear is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Aruba ClearPass writes "Easy to use, multifeatured, and reliable policy management platform for identity authentication and new device onboarding". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Portnox Clear writes "An affordable tool to monitor routers and access points". Aruba ClearPass is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiNAC, Forescout Platform and Microsoft Intune, whereas Portnox Clear is most compared with Portnox CORE. See our Aruba ClearPass vs. Portnox Clear report.
See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.