Based on our user's reviews, we compared Okta Workforce Identity and Auth0 across several parameters.
Based on the user reviews and considering the overall sentiment, Okta Workforce Identity is preferred over Auth0. Users highly value Okta's seamless integration with various applications and systems, robust security measures, and user-friendly interface. They also appreciate Okta's exceptional customer service and support. While Auth0 also receives positive feedback for its ROI, seamless integration, and user-friendly interface, Okta's customer service and support and its ability to streamline access management processes give it an edge over Auth0.
"It is very scalable because it provides a new environment for companies based on their number of users and other factors. The tool can take a lot of users."
"The most valuable feature is interface application integration, but we haven't fully used it yet. We'll need it in the future for a few potential clients."
"It is easily connected and easy to put our app in single sign-on."
"It supports identity federation, FSO and multi-tenancy."
"The most important thing for me is compliance. Everything that they have developed in Auth0 is already certified by many regulators such as ISO. So, we do not need to take care of that. We have the shared responsibility model to share assets with other products we are using in the cloud."
"It has improved our organization by providing login authentication for a mobile app."
"The most valuable feature of the product is scalability."
"It's a very powerful platform. It has the ability to do the usual stuff, according to modern protocols, like OIDC and OAuth 2. But the real benefit of using the platform comes from its flexibility to enhance it with rules and, now, with what they call authentication pipelines. That is the most significant feature, as it allows you to customize everything regarding the authentication and authorization process."
"It is a very scalable solution."
"A solution that's easy to use, stable, and reliable."
"We find the solution to be stable."
"This solution has a lot of capabilities and features."
"It is a very stable solution."
"It's easy to use and straightforward."
"First of all, the solution is very simple."
"The most valuable features depend on a customer's needs. Our customers generally find multi-factor authentication very useful."
"I think they can do a better job in explaining what you're supposed to do next in order to correctly follow an idiomatic approach to using the solution beyond simply passing a JWT token to a server and having the server check then signature to validate the token."
"The product could use a more flexible administration structure"
"The product support for multi-tenancy could be improved."
"There is a possibility to improve the machine-to-machine authentication flow. This part of Auth0 is not really well documented, and we could really gain some additional knowledge on that."
"There could be easy integration with IoT devices for the product."
"In the past, there was an issue with the multi-tenant where there wasn't the ability to manage them."
"This is a costly solution and the price of it should be reduced."
"The price modelling is a bit confusing on the site and can be costly."
"RESTful Web Service calls and their response seem a bit slow."
"We've not had any problems with Okta."
"The ability or the options in the solution for changing the look and feel are not good enough because in our partner portal, essentially what they have is an ugly admin interface."
"We still had to write several internal programs/scripts to complete the user-provisioning process. Okta does not have the ability to provision mailbox accounts for on-premise Exchange or in a hybrid O365 environment. The Group Push function from Okta to AD did not work reliably in our environment."
"The integration with third-party tools needs to be improved."
"The only area of concern in the solution stems from the fact that my company needs some help regarding the setup phase from a partner."
"This user integration with the Okta integration network could be simplified."
"Okta Workforce Identity could improve the support system, they are too slow."
Auth0 is ranked 5th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 14 reviews while Okta Workforce Identity is ranked 3rd in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 59 reviews. Auth0 is rated 8.2, while Okta Workforce Identity is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Auth0 writes "Has good documentation but improvement is needed in MFA and application configurations ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Okta Workforce Identity writes "Extremely easy to work with, simple to set up, and reasonably priced ". Auth0 is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Amazon Cognito, Frontegg, Cloudflare Access and Red Hat Single Sign On, whereas Okta Workforce Identity is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Google Cloud Identity, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Saviynt and IBM Security Verify Access. See our Auth0 vs. Okta Workforce Identity report.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors and best Access Management vendors.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.