We performed a comparison between AWS CodePipeline and Harness based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Build Automation."The integration with other applications is fabulous."
"In AWS, the Cloud DevOps is a managed service from CodeCommit and this has removed the need for a lot of manual steps."
"The integrations are good."
"It helps develop CI/CD implementations with centralized management of code building, deployment, and version control."
"The most valuable feature of AWS CodePipeline is the flexibility of the configuration."
"The product is a one-stop solution that you can use to integrate, deploy and host your application."
"I find performance to be the most valuable CodePipeline feature. It works perfectly and smoothly."
"It's a perfect solution if you are just using AWS."
"It's a highly customizable DevOps tool."
"It would be a much better tool if it could be made compatible with other cloud services as well since this is an area the product currently lacks."
"The solution could improve the documentation. Sometimes we have some issues with the documentation not updating after releasing .NET 6. We had some issues with building the code pipeline, and it was not updating the documentation. It's better to update the code documentation."
"The tool does not provide automated features for evidence collection."
"The support team’s response time must be improved."
"The migration process from one source code to another needs improvement."
"The product’s pricing needs improvement."
"There could be a possibility of deploying tag-based conditions for different environments using the same code base."
"If there are many dependancies involved in the setup, it may take a long time."
"There's also room for improvement in debugging pipeline issues, which can sometimes become complex."
AWS CodePipeline is ranked 3rd in Build Automation with 13 reviews while Harness is ranked 8th in Build Automation with 1 review. AWS CodePipeline is rated 8.4, while Harness is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of AWS CodePipeline writes "A fully managed service with excellent integrations and a flexible architecture". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Harness writes "Provides a good graphical interface, but the initial setup process needs improvement ". AWS CodePipeline is most compared with GitLab, AWS CodeStar, Jenkins, GitHub Actions and TeamCity, whereas Harness is most compared with Tekton, Jenkins, Bamboo, GitHub Actions and Cloudability.
See our list of best Build Automation vendors.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.