AWS Lake Formation vs Snowflake comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
4,795 views|3,994 comparisons
75% willing to recommend
Snowflake Computing Logo
20,550 views|11,604 comparisons
96% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on Mar 6, 2024

We compared Snowflake and AWS Lake Formation based on our user's reviews in several parameters.

In summary, Snowflake is praised for its high performance, scalability, user-friendly interface, and efficient customer support. Users find Snowflake's pricing reasonable and appreciate its positive ROI. On the other hand, AWS Lake Formation is lauded for its flexible pricing, excellent data management capabilities, comprehensive security measures, and seamless integration with other AWS services. Users value its efficient setup process and commendable customer service. Areas for improvement in AWS Lake Formation include usability, access permissions management, data processing speed, documentation, data integration options, and customization features.

Features: Snowflake's valuable features include high performance, scalability, and ease of use. Users appreciate its ability to handle large data volumes quickly. In contrast, AWS Lake Formation offers excellent data management capabilities, comprehensive security measures, and seamless integration with other AWS services. Users enjoy the simple setup process and robust access control mechanisms, ensuring reliable data management and efficient workflows.

Pricing and ROI: The setup cost for Snowflake is seen as reasonable and competitive, with a straightforward and uncomplicated process. Users appreciate the flexible licensing terms and options. On the other hand, AWS Lake Formation offers a flexible and cost-effective pricing model, with a straightforward and hassle-free setup cost. Users value the licensing options provided., The user reviews for Snowflake indicate a positive and beneficial ROI. Similarly, AWS Lake Formation also provides a significant ROI with positive results reported by users.

Room for Improvement: Snowflake has room for improvement in specific areas to enhance user experience and functionality. AWS Lake Formation, on the other hand, needs enhancements in usability, access permissions management, data processing speed, troubleshooting resources, data integration options, and feature customization.

Deployment and customer support: The reviews highlight that when evaluating the duration required for a new tech solution, Snowflake users emphasize distinguishing between deployment and setup phases, while AWS Lake Formation users have varying timeframes for deployment, setup, and implementation, suggesting that these phases should be considered separately., Snowflake's customer service has received positive feedback for promptness and effectiveness. Users appreciate the expertise and helpful guidance provided by the support team. AWS Lake Formation's customer service is also commendable, with users valuing their responsiveness, expertise, and commitment to customer success.

The summary above is based on 43 interviews we conducted recently with Snowflake and AWS Lake Formation users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Lake Formation vs. Snowflake Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution is quite good at handling analytics. It's done a good job at helping us centralize them.""It is seamlessly integrated within the AWS ecosystem, making it straightforward to manage access patterns for AWS-native services.""We use AWS Lake Formation typically for the data warehouse.""The solution has many features that are applicable to events such as audits.""The most important advantage in using AWS Lake Formation is its ability to connect the data lake to the other technologies in AWS. This is what I advise my clients."

More AWS Lake Formation Pros →

"Its performance is most valuable. As compared to SQL Server, we are able to see a significant improvement in performance with Snowflake.""The syntax is advanced which reduces the time to write code.""The feature that is really striking is the ability to translate the SQL workloads into the NoSQL version that can be used by Snowflake.""The solution is easy to use.""For us, the virtual warehousing is likely the most valuable aspect.""The most valuable feature is the snapshot database. In one second, you can just take a snapshot of the database for test purposes.""The querying speed is fast.""The most valuable features are sharing data, Time Travel, Zero Copy Cloning, performance, and speed."

More Snowflake Pros →

Cons
"In our experience what could be improved are not the support, performance or monitoring, but at a managerial level, the very expensive professional services of AWS. This could be an area of improvement for them. It's too expensive to acquire their support.""It falls short when it comes to more granular access control, such as cell-level or row-level entitlements which is a significant drawback for organizations that require precise control over who can access specific rows of data.""For the end-users, it's not as user-friendly as it could be.""AWS Lake Formation's pricing could be cheaper.""The solution could make improvements around orchestration and doing some automation stuff on AWS front automation. It would be useful if we could use automation to build images and use hardened images which are CIS compliant."

More AWS Lake Formation Cons →

"It needs a bit more rigor and governance, which is something you don't get with newer tools. This makes it less enterprise scalable. Its governance and structure can be enhanced, which would really be valuable. I would like to see some kind of prebuilt functionality in terms of having almost like a pre-built data warehouse. A functionality for generating automated kind of pieces would be good.""In a future release we would like to have a link which would allow us to connect to an external database and create certain views in your own database. This is because it is becoming hard for us to compare the data between multiple sources.""There are always a few operation updates here and there that can be made.""If they could bring in some tools for data integration, it would be really great.""I would like to see a client version of the GUI.""There are some stored procedures that we've had trouble with. The solution also needs to fine-tune the connectors to be able to connect into the system source.""The user interface continues to be an issue, especially when we need to get data out of Snowflake. It's very easy to get data in, but it's not too easy to get it out or extract it.""Snowflake needs transparency over costs and pricing."

More Snowflake Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "AWS Lake Formation is a bit expensive."
  • More AWS Lake Formation Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Pricing can be confusing for customers."
  • "The whole licensing system is based on credit points. You can also make a license agreement with the company so that you buy credit points and then you use them. What you do not use in one year can be carried over to the next year."
  • "You pay based on the data that you are storing in the data warehouse and there are no maintenance costs."
  • "It is not cheap."
  • "The pricing for Snowflake is competitive."
  • "On average, with the number of queries that we run, we pay approximately $200 USD per month."
  • "Pricing is approximately $US 50 per DB. Terabyte is around $US 50 per month."
  • "The price of Snowflake is very reasonable."
  • More Snowflake Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Warehouse solutions are best for your needs.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It is seamlessly integrated within the AWS ecosystem, making it straightforward to manage access patterns for AWS-native services.
    Top Answer:There are significant challenges when dealing with external applications, and vendors, or pursuing a hybrid cloud strategy because AWS Lake Formation is specific to AWS and does not integrate… more »
    Top Answer:The best thing about Snowflake is its flexibility in changing warehouse sizes or computational power.
    Top Answer:The real-time streaming feature is limited with Snowflake and could be improved. Currently, Snowflake doesn't support unstructured data. With Snowflake, you need to be very particular about the type… more »
    Ranking
    12th
    Views
    4,795
    Comparisons
    3,994
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    578
    Rating
    6.0
    1st
    Views
    20,550
    Comparisons
    11,604
    Reviews
    35
    Average Words per Review
    432
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Snowflake Computing
    Learn More
    Overview

    AWS Lake Formation is a service that makes it easy to set up a secure data lake in days. A data lake is a centralized, curated, and secured repository that stores all your data, both in its original form and prepared for analysis.

    Snowflake is a cloud-based data warehousing solution for storing and processing data, generating reports and dashboards, and as a BI reporting source. It is used for optimizing costs and using financial data, as well as for migrating data from on-premises to the cloud. The solution is often used as a centralized data warehouse, combining data from multiple sources.

    Snowflake has helped organizations improve query performance, store and process JSON and XML, consolidate multiple databases into one unified table, power company-wide dashboards, increase productivity, reduce processing time, and have easy maintenance with good technical support.

    Its platform is made up of three components:

    1. Cloud services - Snowflake uses ANSI SQL to empower users to optimize their data and manage their infrastructure, while Snowflake handles the security and encryption of stored data.
    2. Query processing - Snowflake's compute layer is made up of virtual cloud data warehouses that let you analyze data through requests. Each of the warehouses does not compete for computing resources, nor do they affect the performance of each other.
    3. Database storage - Snowflake automatically manages all parts of the data storage process, including file size, compression, organization, structure, metadata, and statistics.

    Snowflake has many valuable vital features. Some of the most useful ones include:

    • Snowflake architecture provides nearly unlimited scalability and high speed because it uses a single elastic performance engine. The solution also supports unlimited concurrent users and workloads, from interactive to batch.
    • Snowflake makes automation easy and enables enterprises to automate data management, security, governance, availability, and data resiliency.
    • With seamless cross-cloud and cross-region connections, Snowflake eliminates ETL and data silos. Anyone who needs access to shared secure data can get a single copy via the data cloud. In addition, Snowflake makes remote collaboration and decision-making fast and easy via a single shared data source.
    • Snowflake’s Data Marketplace offers third-party data, which allows you to connect with Snowflake customers to extend workflows with data services and third-party applications.

    There are many benefits to implementing Snowflake. It helps optimize costs, reduce downtime, improve operational efficiency, and automate data replication for fast recovery, and it is built for high reliability and availability.

      Below are quotes from interviews we conducted with users currently using the Snowflake solution:

      Sreenivasan R., Director of Data Architecture and Engineering at Decision Minds, says, "Data sharing is a good feature. It is a majorly used feature. The elastic computing is another big feature. Separating computing and storage gives you flexibility. It doesn't require much DBA involvement because it doesn't need any performance tuning. We are not doing any performance tuning, and the entire burden of performance and SQL tuning is on Snowflake. Its usability is very good. I don't need to ramp up any user, and its onboarding is easier. You just onboard the user, and you are done with it. There are simple SQL and UI, and people are able to use this solution easily. Ease of use is a big thing in Snowflake."

      A director of business operations at a logistics company mentions, "It requires no maintenance on our part. They handle all that. The speed is phenomenal. The pricing isn't really anything more than what you would be paying for a SQL server license or another tool to execute the same thing. We have zero maintenance on our side to do anything and the speed at which it performs queries and loads the data is amazing. It handles unstructured data extremely well, too. So, if the data is in a JSON array or an XML, it handles that super well."

      A Solution Architect at a wholesaler/distributor comments, "The ability to share the data and the ability to scale up and down easily are the most valuable features. The concept of data sharing and data plumbing made it very easy to provide and share data. The ability to refresh your Dev or QA just by doing a clone is also valuable. It has the dynamic scale up and scale down feature. Development and deployment are much easier as compared to other platforms where you have to go through a lot of stuff. With a tool like DBT, you can do modeling and transformation within a single tool and deploy to Snowflake. It provides continuous deployment and continuous integration abilities. There is a separation of storage and compute, so you only get charged for your usage. You only pay for what you use. When we share the data downstream with business partners, we can specifically create compute for them, and we can charge back the business."

      Sample Customers
      bp, Cerner, Expedia, Finra, HESS, intuit, Kellog's, Philips, TIME, workday
      Accordant Media, Adobe, Kixeye Inc., Revana, SOASTA, White Ops
      Top Industries
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Financial Services Firm21%
      Computer Software Company12%
      Manufacturing Company8%
      University5%
      REVIEWERS
      Computer Software Company30%
      Financial Services Firm20%
      Healthcare Company6%
      Manufacturing Company6%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Educational Organization27%
      Financial Services Firm13%
      Computer Software Company10%
      Manufacturing Company6%
      Company Size
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Small Business17%
      Midsize Enterprise10%
      Large Enterprise72%
      REVIEWERS
      Small Business26%
      Midsize Enterprise21%
      Large Enterprise54%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Small Business15%
      Midsize Enterprise35%
      Large Enterprise51%
      Buyer's Guide
      AWS Lake Formation vs. Snowflake
      May 2024
      Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Lake Formation vs. Snowflake and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
      772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

      AWS Lake Formation is ranked 12th in Cloud Data Warehouse with 5 reviews while Snowflake is ranked 1st in Cloud Data Warehouse with 94 reviews. AWS Lake Formation is rated 7.6, while Snowflake is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of AWS Lake Formation writes "Strategically aligning data management in a multi-cloud environment with significant reporting challenges". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Snowflake writes "Good usability, good data sharing and elastic compute features, and requires less DBA involvement". AWS Lake Formation is most compared with Azure Data Factory, Amazon Redshift, Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics, BigQuery and Amazon EMR, whereas Snowflake is most compared with BigQuery, Azure Data Factory, Teradata, Vertica and Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse. See our AWS Lake Formation vs. Snowflake report.

      See our list of best Cloud Data Warehouse vendors.

      We monitor all Cloud Data Warehouse reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.