We performed a comparison between AWS WAF and Comodo cWatch based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."The most valuable feature is that it is very easy to configure. It just takes a couple of minutes."
"The most valuable features of AWS WAF are its cloud-native and on-demand."
"It is Amazon. Everything is scalable. It is beyond what we need."
"It's simple, easy to use."
"This is not a product that you need to install. You just use it."
"The customized billing is the most valuable feature."
"The stability of AWS WAF is valuable."
"The product’s availability, ease of configuration, and documentation are valuable."
"We get alerts if we have some malware."
"The solution is pretty stable. I've never faced pressing issues or hanging issue."
"The FIM feature, the information in the new management system, and their support are the most valuable features. The scanned results are quite fast as compared to other platforms compared to scanning timing. It takes about a minute or two minutes. Also, the results of the Comodo scan results are in detail."
"The product must provide more features."
"I would like to be able to view a graphical deployment map in the user interface that will give me an overview of the configuration and help to determine whether I have missed any steps."
"AWS WAF could improve by making the overall management easier. Many people that have started working with AWS WAF do not have an easy time. They should make it easy to use."
"The pricing model is complicated."
"There is room for improvement in pricing."
"It would be good if the solution provided managed WAF services."
"One area that could be improved is the DDoS protection."
"Technical support for AWS WAF needs improvement."
"The solution needs to build better performance, specifically in the hardware resources."
"The portal is a little slow."
"A small problem is from the support team. Sometimes they are a bit delayed."
Earn 20 points
AWS WAF is ranked 1st in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 52 reviews while Comodo cWatch is ranked 36th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 4 reviews. AWS WAF is rated 8.0, while Comodo cWatch is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of AWS WAF writes "A highly stable solution that helps mitigate different kinds of bot attacks and SQL injection attacks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Comodo cWatch writes "Alerts organizations if any malware is detected and removes it quickly". AWS WAF is most compared with Azure Web Application Firewall, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, F5 Advanced WAF, Imperva Web Application Firewall and Fortinet FortiWeb, whereas Comodo cWatch is most compared with Atomic ModSecurity Rules, Cloudflare, Sucuri and SiteLock.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.