We performed a comparison between Azure Backup and Druva Phoenix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Zerto, Commvault and others in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software."There is only one feature, and that is the backup."
"Setting up Azure Backup is straightforward and the total deployment time was about a month."
"It is a stable solution...The product is worth the money you pay for it."
"The deployment process is quite easy in Azure."
"I like that it's a stable solution and their support is good. I think Microsoft's commercial force is superior."
"It's useful, it works, and it's fairly reliable."
"This solution allows me to restore either the VM or the data, depending on what is needed."
"The initial setup was very easy."
"Druva Phoenix is easy to use and easy to start with."
"I found the cost-effectiveness of Druva Phoenix to be its most valuable feature, especially when compared to on-premises backup solutions."
"I would definitively say that we have been able to make our people more productive by at least 30%."
"Once you set it up and you tell it exactly what needs to be backed up, you literally forget about it. It sends you emails and notifications of the current status of the jobs."
"The most valuable features of Druva Phoenix are the simple portal to log in and flexibility."
"I would like to have the option to increase the frequency of the backups. Azure Backup does backups on an hourly basis, but I would prefer it to take backups more often."
"Azure Backup's licensing model is very challenging because it doesn't give a clear picture."
"Technical support is in need of improvement."
"While Azure Backup allows ingress data, the egress data is chargeable, which should be excluded."
"The user interface is a little bit confusing and it could be better."
"Ransomware protection is missing in Azure Backup."
"The time required to restore files should be a little faster."
"The solution’s user interface could be improved."
"Druva Phoenix is optimized to work with x86 platforms, making it unsuitable for backing up non-x86 architectures like AIX. The solution is primarily designed for physical Linux and Windows systems based on the x86 architecture, as well as virtualized Windows and Linux environments. However, if you have an AIX system, it cannot be deployed in the cloud, and therefore, backing it up in the cloud is not a concern."
"There is room for improvement in the reporting aspect of Druva Phoenix."
"Druva Phoenix should include a few reporting features that it doesn't provide currently."
"They were able to give us a very reasonable price considering we were non-for-profit organizations, however, there is always room for improvement on that cost."
Azure Backup is ranked 7th in Backup and Recovery with 51 reviews while Druva Phoenix is ranked 15th in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software with 5 reviews. Azure Backup is rated 7.8, while Druva Phoenix is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Azure Backup writes "Straightforward to set up and manage and allows us to monitor all backups in one place". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Druva Phoenix writes "Cost-effective and has excellent technical support". Azure Backup is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Rubrik, Commvault Cloud, Veritas NetBackup and Quest Rapid Recovery, whereas Druva Phoenix is most compared with Druva inSync, Veeam Backup & Replication, AWS Backup, Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365 and Cirrus Backup.
See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.
We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.