We performed a comparison between Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) and SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Container Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Azure Kubernetes Service is pretty robust in terms of scalability and auto-scaling fixes."
"The product has built-in functionality that checks whether the service is available or not. In case the service is down, the tool will create a new instance by default. Hence, the web API will be always up irrespective of the server or the situation."
"The advantage of AKS is somewhat greater than that of Kubernetes, such as those provided by Google Cloud or AWS. However, the unique benefit offered by Microsoft is its robust CI/CD capabilities, along with the Azure feature for building workflows. When you combine the entire ecosystem, AKS becomes an excellent choice, particularly for enterprise applications."
"The product serves the purpose of helping streamline our company's application deployment and scaling processes."
"It is a stable solution."
"Its support team resolves technical issues accurately."
"We find the container orchestration tool that this solution provides to be very valuable."
"Compliance is easy right out-of-the-box with integration to Azure Security, Azure Active Directory, and Azure Policies."
"When creating cloud infrastructure, Cloud Native Security evaluates the cloud security parameters and how they will impact the organization's risk. It lets us know whether our security parameter conforms to international industry standards. It alerts us about anything that increases our risk, so we can address those vulnerabilities and prevent attacks."
"It is scalable, stable, and can detect any threat on a machine. It uses artificial intelligence and can lock down any virus."
"PingSafe released a new security graph tool that helps us identify the root issue. Other tools give you a pass/fail type of profile on all misconfigurations, and those will run into the thousands. PingSafe's graphing algorithm connects various components together and tries to identify what is severe and what is not. It can correlate various vulnerabilities and datasets to test them on the back end to pinpoint the real issue."
"The most valuable features of PingSafe are the asset inventory and issue indexing."
"Cloud Native Security is user-friendly. Everything in the Cloud Native Security tool is straightforward, including detections, integration, reporting, etc. They are constantly improving their UI by adding plugins and other features."
"I like CSPM the most. It captures a lot of alerts within a short period of time. When an alert gets triggered on the cloud, it throws an alert within half an hour, which is very reasonable. It is a plus point for us."
"Cloud Native Security offers attack path analysis."
"PingSafe offers an intuitive user interface that lets us navigate quickly and easily."
"The solution's cost could be cheaper."
"The solution's logs have room for improvement."
"It would be nice if they could handle the management of personal information more efficiently."
"The product’s cost could be reduced."
"There are some limitations with the tutor version, particularly in terms of using a lot of free audio. The private level also has restrictions, limiting the number of audio files you can access to just 50. If you want more, you need to contact support."
"The engineering team can reduce the management of the platform itself by improving the data plane part of the system to upload more management."
"The technical support could be faster."
"Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is not up to optimal standards when it comes to capturing logs and visualization."
"Customized queries should be made easier to improve PingSafe."
"When you find a vulnerability and resolve it, the same issue will not occur again. I want PingSafe to block the same vulnerability from appearing again. I want something like a playbook where the steps that we take to resolve an issue are repeated when that issue happens again."
"Their search feature could be better."
"here is a bit of a learning curve. However, you only need two to three days to identify options and get accustomed."
"We had a glitch in PingSafe where it fed us false positives in the past."
"They could generally give us better comprehensive rules."
"Some of the navigation and some aspects of the portal may be a little bit confusing."
"The alerting system of the product is an area that I look at and sometimes get confused about. I feel the alerting feature needs improvement."
More Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) Pricing and Cost Advice →
More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is ranked 13th in Container Security with 32 reviews while SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is ranked 6th in Container Security with 67 reviews. Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is rated 8.2, while SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) writes "Decreases administrative burdens and costs, has good diagnostic tools, and is easy to deploy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security writes "Provides excellent workload telemetry, hunting capabilities, and deep visibility ". Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is most compared with Red Hat OpenShift, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, SUSE Rancher and Qualys VMDR, whereas SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, Orca Security and AWS GuardDuty. See our Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security report.
See our list of best Container Security vendors.
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
