We performed a comparison between Azure OpenAI and Google Cloud AI Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two AI Development Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product's initial setup phase was pretty easy."
"We can use the solution to implement our tasks and models quickly."
"My goal was to create an experience where project managers don't have to read through entire documents. Instead, they can ask a question and receive relevant point analysis. This analysis identifies the document and specific section where the information resides. Previously, users had to rely on these document references. Now, Azure OpenAI enhances the experience by providing the answer directly in the user's own language, relevant to their context."
"OpenAI's models are more mature than Watson's. They offer a wider range of features and provide richer outputs."
"Azure OpenAI is useful for benchmarking products."
"The product is easy to integrate with our IT workflow."
"Its versatility makes it incredibly useful for technical problem-solving, content creation, data analytics, and more."
"Our clients are interested in building knowledge bases, particularly in child welfare. In this domain, we focus on supporting caseworkers by compiling and organizing relevant information. This information is then stored in a database using a query. The database generates summaries and reminders for specific actions and even facilitates sending emails to parents or other relevant parties. The system's complexity is tailored to the specific needs of child welfare cases. Additionally, we're exploring opportunities to assist a healthcare organization. Specifically, we're working on streamlining the process of filling out forms required for insurance claims. This effort aims to ensure that hospitals can receive funding or payment for the care they provide."
"On GCP, we are exposing our API services to our clients so that they send us their information. It can be single individual records or it can be a batch of their clients."
"The initial setup is very straightforward."
"A range of a a wide range of algorithms, EIM voice mails, which can be plugged in right away into your solution into into into our solution, and then have platform that provides know, to to come up with an operational solution really quick."
"Since the model could be trained in just a couple of hours and deploying it took only a few minutes, the entire process took less than an hour."
"Some of the valuable features are the vast amount of services that are available, such as load balancer, and the AI architecture."
"The solution is able to read 90% of the documents correctly with a 10% error rate."
"I think the user interface is quite handy, and it is easy to use as compared to the other cloud platforms."
"Deployment was slightly complex for me to understand."
"The product features themselves are fine. However, with Microsoft scaling the service so much, the support structure needs to keep pace. When solving complex issues, the process of interacting with Microsoft can be quite time-consuming."
"I noticed there are no instructional videos or guides on the network portal for initial configurations. There is limited information available, and this is a concern for me. I would like to see more resources and guides to address these issues."
"We encountered challenges related to question understanding."
"The solution needs to accommodate smaller companies."
"Azure OpenAI is not an optimized tool yet, making it one of its shortcomings where improvements are required."
"One area for improvement is providing more flexibility in configuration and connectivity with external tools."
"The solution's response is a bit slow sometimes."
"One thing that I found is that Azure ML does not directly provide you with features on Google Cloud AI Platform, whereas Vertex provides some features of the platform."
"It could be more clear, and sometimes there are errors that I don't quite understand."
"The solution can be improved by simplifying the process to make your own models."
"The initial setup was straightforward for me but could be difficult for others."
"At first, there were only the user-managed rules to identify the best attributes of the individual. Then, we came up with a truth set and developed different machine learning models with the help of that truth set, so now it's completely machine learning."
"Customizations are very difficult, and they take time."
"I think it's the it it also has has evolved quite a bit over the last few years, and Google Cloud folks have been getting, more and more services. But I think from a improvement standpoint, so maybe they can look at adding more algorithms, so adding more AI algorithms to their suite."
Azure OpenAI is ranked 2nd in AI Development Platforms with 26 reviews while Google Cloud AI Platform is ranked 6th in AI Development Platforms with 7 reviews. Azure OpenAI is rated 8.0, while Google Cloud AI Platform is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Azure OpenAI writes "Created a chatbot powered by OpenAI to answer HR, travel, and expense-related questions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Google Cloud AI Platform writes "An AI platform AI Platform to train your machine learning models at scale, to host your trained model in the cloud, and to use your model to make predictions about new data". Azure OpenAI is most compared with Google Vertex AI, Amazon SageMaker, Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio, Hugging Face and IBM Watson Studio, whereas Google Cloud AI Platform is most compared with Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio, IBM Watson Machine Learning, Google Vertex AI, Hugging Face and Amazon SageMaker. See our Azure OpenAI vs. Google Cloud AI Platform report.
See our list of best AI Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all AI Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.