We performed a comparison between Azure Site Recovery and NAKIVO Backup & Replication based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Our primary use case is for disaster recovery and business continuity and disaster recovery (BCDR)."
"It is a very stable product and very scalable."
"What I like best about Azure Site Recovery is that it's easier to use because my organization already has Azure as an Active Directory solution."
"The most useful thing is that it provides a snapshot of your environment in about 15 minutes. It is stable, and it always works. It is also scalable and easy to set up."
"They're moving a lot of their workload to cloud and aiming for a seamlessly integrated product."
"The solution is secure, reliable, and scalable."
"Azure Site Recovery allows my company to save around 30 percent of the time on every VM that we need to back up and restore."
"Azure Site Recovery is an easy-to-use and fairly stable solution for disaster recovery."
"Technical support responds very quickly."
"The solution has a user-friendly interface and is easy to configure."
"Nakivo is an easy-to-use, robust and cost-effective backup solution. I highly recommend it."
"Nakivo has improved our organization largely due to the fact that it is an extremely robust backup system."
"The interface is basic and very easy to use which is what we are looking for."
"The ability to create a replica of all virtual machines is a great feature."
"This product has a very clean and intuitive GUI."
"The easy management and a good overview are the most important aspects."
"One area for improvement with Azure is helping customers predict usage more accurately."
"The product's performance is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The support team took a lot of time to respond and was not very professional."
"The tool should improve synchronization."
"We need to be able to move the virtual servers and not build and then port them across. They need to improve the hypervisor."
"The primary area for improvement in Azure Site Recovery is its pricing."
"Site Recovery's scalability could be improved."
"Azure Site Recovery's deployment is complex. There are a lot of bugs, and it needs to improve stability."
"We want the backup job to consume fewer resources, as the utilization is very high if we choose the best compression."
"Integrations maybe helpful for NAKIVO. I think end-to-end backup and user backup will be useful to have. The price could be reduced as well. I also think that AD integration should be more available."
"While Nakivo delivers comprehensive solutions, there's room for enhancement, particularly regarding Proxmox support."
"Updating VM Tools on a replicated VM could be better."
"I would love to see BackBlaze B2 implementation in the future, as that would be our preferred cloud destination, but Amazon and Wasabi are both very great choices in the meantime."
"Automatic updates do not work, and every update has to be done manually."
"In the future, I would like to see support for backing up data to more cloud platforms, besides Amazon."
"I would like to see some additional models in the next release to make backups more functional."
Azure Site Recovery is ranked 1st in Disaster Recovery as a Service with 19 reviews while NAKIVO Backup & Replication is ranked 5th in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software with 85 reviews. Azure Site Recovery is rated 8.2, while NAKIVO Backup & Replication is rated 9.4. The top reviewer of Azure Site Recovery writes "Useful for restoration purposes that ensures that the users get to save a lot of time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NAKIVO Backup & Replication writes "Good deduplication, easy to configure, and offers a free version". Azure Site Recovery is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Zerto, VMware SRM, AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and Commvault Cloud, whereas NAKIVO Backup & Replication is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup, Acronis Cyber Protect, Rubrik and Zerto. See our Azure Site Recovery vs. NAKIVO Backup & Replication report.
See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.
We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.