We performed a comparison between Betty Blocks and OutSystems based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the back end."
"The flow editor is the most valuable feature. It is simple and intuitive, and it can guide you step-by-step."
"Scalability proved to be an exceptionally beneficial feature."
"The most important features of this tool are its visual modeling capabilities and drag and drop functionality. You can see what you are coding which makes it easy to understand and maintain. They have also created a big revolution in digital transformation by introducing native mobile app development under the same IDE."
"The tool makes the development process easier."
"The most valuable feature of OutSystems with discipline and the development processes. Instead of each developer doing tasks on their own with their own approach, et cetera, the solution would help bring some organization to the development process."
"Reduces the manual labor in compiling and deploying applications and generating procedural code (by reducing development bureaucracy/processes, resulting in real gains). The LifeTime Server approach, requiring just a few steps to publish applications in production environments, is fantastic."
"The product is mostly stable."
"OutSystems' best feature is that you can build tests with the flow, so even the tests are made in the PDD framework in a low-code way."
"I would like to see full integration with AI."
"What I find lacking in the software is its ability to query the database."
"In many cases, they make choices where flexibility is a little bit degraded, but if you leave everything open and the flexibility is great then the usability is a little bit less."
"In OutSystems, cloud management is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"We have performance issues while fetching bulk data."
"It is hard to find the logic in OutSystems. From an improvement perspective, I want to be able to properly use logic in OutSystems."
"I have difficulty in using several new features. Some of the product's features are tricky to use as well."
"The tutorials for the solution should be updated."
"The solution's testing framework needs to be improved, and the workflow should be slightly more mature."
"Writing custom code still needs to be done via Integration Studio. This might have been added to the IDE."
"Since we first started using OutSystems, they switched their language support from Java and .NET to .NET only, which was a bit of a surprise. Their language support could be better in this sense, although on our resource side it is now a bit more flexible."
Betty Blocks is ranked 27th in Rapid Application Development Software with 2 reviews while OutSystems is ranked 3rd in Rapid Application Development Software with 46 reviews. Betty Blocks is rated 7.6, while OutSystems is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Betty Blocks writes "The solution is stable and has good support, but is expensive ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OutSystems writes "The visual program provides the advantage of only requiring one skill set for both the front and backend ". Betty Blocks is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps and Mendix, whereas OutSystems is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Appian, Mendix, ServiceNow and Oracle Application Express (APEX). See our Betty Blocks vs. OutSystems report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.