Board vs QlikView comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Board International Logo
595 views|405 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Qlik Logo
2,668 views|2,299 comparisons
92% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Board and QlikView based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Reporting solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Board vs. QlikView Report (Updated: March 2024).
772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable features are the reporting and the charts. The reporting functionality is handy for aggregation, when it comes to planning. That ability is fascinating and our users are very happy with it. The charts and the reporting allow our users to see all the data and to see how things are going this year or in the COVID situation. They're seeing everything. Instead of having to check data line by line, they're seeing it in a graph and they're seeing it in charts.""​Our data is now more structured. Between our data warehouse and BOARD, which are both brand new, we now have a more structured data view with more accurate, timely data.""The drill down is good for people who have that high level view, because they can do some analysis based on it.""Where it used to take me three days at the beginning of the year to create the new financial statement, now it is a matter of minutes because all the data is in the system.""By using Board we can do a lot of free analysis. We can change the layout of a table and even the end-user can change the layout of a table. And in Board 11.2 you can save the layout. That's very useful for the customer, it's a very good function.""The ability to create a data model and have it in testing within a week is fantastic.""The benefits are getting the data in one spot, the ability to report dynamically, and version control.""It is useful for self-analysis regarding company data and helps to find areas where we can improve."

More Board Pros →

"The product’s most valuable feature is its ability to view the entire data available for analysis.""It's pretty easy to deploy.""The search feature: ability to see the related data.""You can do a lot of things on the back end which are not possible in the other solutions on the market.""It enables us to configure various elements, such as dashboard settings, including factors like color schemes and other customization parameters.""Once you open it up, you see everything that you can do.""One of the good thing is that you can integrate different data source technologies. So you can model your environment without having any of our views running.""It has user-friendly data visualization features, supporting our decision-making process with its business intelligence capabilities"

More QlikView Pros →

Cons
"It's very powerful, but there is also a big learning curve. ​It should be a little more intuitive.""I would like to see a better Web client, where the controls work the same way as in the Windows client. I do think that the focus is now on the Web, so it should be improved upon.""If we could upload other data, e.g., pivot tables which can be done in BOARD already, that we have pre-existing and have that data distribute to more complex spreadsheets​, I would like that going forward.""It needs more export to Excel functionality. Right now, we're having to build within the cloud-based platform, as well as build within the Excel add-in, because the export to Excel is somewhat ugly.""One thing that I personally would like to see is additional visualization tools for visuals.""The product can be improved by making it possible to know where cubes are used.""​My analysts have used the technical support. Sometimes they have felt like they did not receive the answer that they needed, or you have to go and upgrade in order to address a problem. ​""We would like to see better logging in the procedural world."

More Board Cons →

"They could improve the update time.""QlikView certainly lacks in its ability to share visualizations or create visualizations easily.""There is no automation or drag and drop functionality.""It is really old. We are moving towards converting everything into a Power BI environment. We want to have a self-service type of BI environment where different levels of users in organizations can log onto a portal and retrieve the data they need or get the necessary insights for decision-making that's important for them or their business unit. They have built a new version of QlikView called QlikSense, which probably competes with newer BI tools, such as Power BI, but they are far behind. That's why we are moving towards a newer tool that's easier to use and has more visualizations to represent the data.""Enhancing user-friendliness would be highly beneficial.""The pricing is high.""Installation and deployment could be made easier and quicker.""There is a lack of static PDF report generation and automatic resizing of the dashboard to fit the device."

More QlikView Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Find a partner who will take responsibility for the implementation, and be available for support."
  • "​In terms of the pricing, it was reasonable. BOARD is not the lowest in the market, but it was reasonable for us."
  • "It is not the cheapest product on earth, but you get so much. It provides good value for money."
  • "The solution is quite expensive, if it is made cheaper then we can have more clients. I rate it four out of ten."
  • More Board Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Pricing is a bit too high and I think licenses should be unlimited."
  • "QlikView pricing and licensing is on the high side for a small sized company, but it's competitive among its peers."
  • "Qlik is fairly high in terms of pricing."
  • "The pricing is too high compared to the other solutions on the market."
  • "It is not very expensive. I think it it is on par with other similar products on the market."
  • "The setup costs for QlikView are fair as are the yearly maintenance fees. The licensing becomes a bit more expensive and requires some planning for onboarding."
  • "It has an annual license. It is expensive as compared to other competitive tools that do more for less. In South African rands, we pay about 100,000 to 200,000 a year."
  • "On a scale of one to ten, where one being low price and ten being high price, I rate pricing a four."
  • More QlikView Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Reporting solutions are best for your needs.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparison Review
    Anonymous User
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We've had several FP&A departments include Anaplan in their analytics discussions, and while BI information IS generated, the focus is generally on compiling input from various sources and… more »
    Top Answer:All the reports are prepared automatically.
    Top Answer:Sometimes, the data disappears from the product. We have had a few such cases. When I added my comments to the data, it disappeared. A technical specialist tried to restore it. It was not convenient… more »
    Top Answer:If you correctly use the product for your use cases, it provides value for money.
    Top Answer:My firm got the product at a cheap price, but in general, I believe that the product is a bit costly.
    Top Answer:Many of the features in Qlik Sense need to be available and reintroduced in QlikView. I believe many of the features have been added to QlikView after the layout containers were introduced. QlikView… more »
    Ranking
    19th
    out of 50 in Reporting
    Views
    595
    Comparisons
    405
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    470
    Rating
    7.3
    5th
    out of 50 in Reporting
    Views
    2,668
    Comparisons
    2,299
    Reviews
    20
    Average Words per Review
    469
    Rating
    8.2
    Comparisons
    Anaplan logo
    Compared 29% of the time.
    SAP Analytics Cloud logo
    Compared 15% of the time.
    IBM Planning Analytics logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    Oracle Hyperion logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    Microsoft Power BI logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Tableau logo
    Compared 22% of the time.
    Microsoft Power BI logo
    Compared 13% of the time.
    Amazon QuickSight logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    SQL Server logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    TIBCO Spotfire logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Learn More
    Overview

    BOARD International - headquartered in Switzerland - is a leading global provider of software for improving business results through better decision making. By unifying Business Intelligence and Corporate Performance Management into a single product, BOARD enables companies to achieve a shared vision of their performance across the entire organization, and thus a single version of the truth.

    BOARD provides seamless solutions for • Reporting & Analysis • Budgeting, Planning & Forecasting • Profitability Modelling & Optimization • Simulation & What-if-Analysis • Scorecarding & Strategy Management • Financial Consolidation. Based on visual modelling, BOARD has enabled global companies to deploy BI and CPM applications without a single line of code in a fraction of the time and cost associated with traditional solutions.

    QlikView is a Business Intelligence tool that allows you to keep tabs on all of your business-related information in a clean, clear, and easy to access database that is intuitive to build and simple to navigate. It is ideal for business owners who wish to improve overall output by creating the most productive system possible.

    Sample Customers
    Coca-Cola, Puma, Desigual, Ricoh, KPMG, H&M, Groupe SEB
    Canon, Gatorade, Amcor, Panasonic, Fila, Cambridge University Hospitals, Global Retail Bank, North Yorkshire Police department, Lanoo Group Publishers, and AonGroep Nederland.
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Government20%
    Healthcare Company20%
    Hospitality Company10%
    Real Estate/Law Firm5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Wholesaler/Distributor7%
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company16%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Retailer6%
    Consumer Goods Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business37%
    Midsize Enterprise40%
    Large Enterprise23%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise60%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business39%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise41%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise71%
    Buyer's Guide
    Board vs. QlikView
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Board vs. QlikView and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Board is ranked 19th in Reporting with 35 reviews while QlikView is ranked 5th in Reporting with 158 reviews. Board is rated 8.6, while QlikView is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Board writes "A stable solution with good user-experience, easy deployment but needs some improvement with engine ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of QlikView writes "Useful for data visualization and business intelligence". Board is most compared with Anaplan, SAP Analytics Cloud, IBM Planning Analytics, Oracle Hyperion and Microsoft Power BI, whereas QlikView is most compared with Tableau, Microsoft Power BI, Amazon QuickSight, SQL Server and TIBCO Spotfire. See our Board vs. QlikView report.

    See our list of best Reporting vendors.

    We monitor all Reporting reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.