We performed a comparison between Bosch inubit and IBM BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."We contact their customer support often. They are very good and reliable."
"I would say that I like its GUI designer the best."
"One thing that I love about them is that they make it easier to integrate with other systems, especially with the use of smaller files."
"This solution is very stable."
"The solution is stable."
"Previously, our company's business automation process was slow. IBM BPM's schedule and response functionalities are excellent...There are countless use cases in which IBM BPM proves to be a valuable tool for my clients."
"It helps maintain, and in many instances, lower costs, as well as to maintain those costs, keeping them stable."
"I like the APIs and the BPM coach is a good tool. But if I had to pick one, it would be the API."
"Responsive Portal + Process Federation Server. This set of solutions offers a unified worklist to our customers."
"There are better solutions on the market. To make it a perfect ten, they should improve the price. There is a learning curve and sometimes there are issues from the software."
"All our clients are changing to microservice and cloud service. However, BPM does not have a solution for microservice and cloud service."
"It is a rather thick stack because you have to have WebSphere skills, IBM BPM skills, and an understanding of how the product runs on WebSphere. A lot of this will start to get a lot easier as they put it in containers, which will allow the platform to manage itself in some regards."
"I would say the scalability is very good but it's not perfect. It is much more scalable than it has been in the past but... it does require some work to keep it stable. So that is an area that should be improved."
"IBM BPM's UI is an area with shortcomings where improvements are required."
"The initial setup was complex."
"The coaches and the user interface are the areas that can be improved a lot. It is good in terms of data processing, but the UI, scripting, and coaches are not very user-friendly and developer-friendly. Performance is always an issue. The scripting and the pattern that it uses are very tedious for new developers to understand, and it takes time to master it in depth. When comparing IBM BPM with IBM APN, a lot of things are provided out of the box in IBM APN. We don't have to write code or a Java connector to make a functionality work. It would be very helpful and time-saving for developers if IBM BPM is improved in this area to provide many functionalities or drag-and-drop options so that the developers don't have to write the code."
"The initial setup process is complex for basic users."
"Process versioning was tricky, not straightforward."
Earn 20 points
Bosch inubit is ranked 42nd in Business Process Management (BPM) while IBM BPM is ranked 5th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 105 reviews. Bosch inubit is rated 8.0, while IBM BPM is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Bosch inubit writes "First Look – Bosch Software Innovations inubit Suite 6". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM BPM writes "Offers good case management and its integration with process design but there's a learning curve". Bosch inubit is most compared with Camunda and SAP Signavio Process Manager, whereas IBM BPM is most compared with Camunda, Appian, Pega BPM, IBM Business Automation Workflow and Apache Airflow.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.