We performed a comparison between Celonis and Process Mining Group ProM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Celonis, UiPath, Automation Anywhere and others in Process Mining."The process chart is valuable in identifying the bottlenecks."
"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten. Celonis is a wonderful tool, so you cannot find any drawbacks at the right moment."
"Celonis is one of the best solutions on the market. It offers you a lot of training materials and exposure to its ecosystem. Celonis is trying its best to prepare an ecosystem for it because, without an ecosystem, you will not be able to scale up."
"We can use it to discover processes and mitigate the mistakes in the process."
"Cause analyzer is a very good feature."
"The process mapping is most valuable to us."
"Celonis, especially for high-risk finance-related processes, helped us make precise decisions and uncover hidden values within our architecture. It was one of the most significant values our business identified. Additionally, it helped us during the migration process."
"I like the spaghetti it throws off when configuring the sequence of processes and tracking the endpoint. I also like the variation from these defined processes and what is being observed on the ground. I'm exploring the root cause analysis a lot these days, and it seems to be quite interesting. But again, there are a lot of external dependencies on that. But I think the spaghetti, and the one that shows the variation and the performance gap, is something which I really like."
"The most valuable feature of Process Mining Group ProM is the toolkit it provides all kinds of variants of process mining. They have one option that you can visualize which processes you mine, and that's a very powerful tool."
"In the next release, I would like for them to integrate more custom features to ease the process of having multiple solutions. I would like to be able to integrate it with other solutions."
"The UI could be improved."
"The price is high for us."
"The solution needs to implement more automation aspects into the product. Right now, it's lacking."
"They should provide a community edition license so that everyone can deploy or install it on their own system and get more hands-on experience with the product."
"They could provide artificial intelligence where, based on data they collect from reference cases, they could give us suggestions."
"I have noticed Celonis and Azure, as Infrastructure-as-a-service do not communicate well with each other. Since Celonis has recently acquired PAF they would try to synergize their operations with Microsoft tools. In the next couple of years, they should be more connected to the Microsoft ecosystems. In the long term, they should integrate more with SAP which is a partner of Microsoft. This would result in cost efficiencies."
"The task mining feature of Celonis needs improvement because it's more challenging than it looks."
"Process Mining Group ProM could improve user-friendliness and the error messages that are provided are not helpful for end users."
Celonis is ranked 1st in Process Mining with 44 reviews while Process Mining Group ProM is ranked 11th in Process Mining with 1 review. Celonis is rated 8.4, while Process Mining Group ProM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Celonis writes "Great process mining, process discovery, and opportunity identification". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Process Mining Group ProM writes "Powerful tool, beneficial process mining variants, and scalable". Celonis is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Manager, UiPath Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, Software AG ARIS Process Mining and ABBYY Timeline, whereas Process Mining Group ProM is most compared with .
See our list of best Process Mining vendors.
We monitor all Process Mining reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.