We performed a comparison between Centerity Monitor and Zabbix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The machine learning feature is valuable."
"The performance and bandwidth are valuable features."
"The template system in Zabbix is very beneficial as it saves time in configuration."
"The solution is quite mature and very stable."
"Zabbix is quite stable once it is set up. We haven't had any post-setup issues."
"The most valuable features are the monitoring and the ease with which we can set it up at customer sites with our custom Zabbix proxy and tools."
"We are able to do problem determination on runaway processes."
"I really enjoy network traffic triggers that allow us to check traffic threshold from ISP."
"There are lots of great features and functionality within the solution."
"They can improve the functionality that provides some numbers related to the behavior of the metrics."
"Zabbix claims that there is an auto-discovery process but my team member was facing difficulty and was told that it's not really automatic, and there are some manual steps."
"The dashboard and the graph section could be a little bit more professional."
"When we have a problem, we have to do a lot of research to solve it."
"To improve Zabbix, adding more features to support the monitoring of modern workloads like containers would be beneficial."
"We had some scalability issues with a large number of nodes."
"The APM monitoring has room for improvement, although I hear that the new 5.2 version has some improvements in that area, and I'd like to give that a go. I would like to see a few more templates out there for different styles of monitoring. I use the Grafana interface for reporting. I would also like it to have an out-of-the-box ability to email reports. You can create reports, but to be able to email those reports would be really helpful. I've got users who are not interested in logging in and generating a report. They want it all pre-canned and sent to an email address. It would also be really handy if we could pin certain reports up onto platforms such as Teams or SharePoint. A GUI for the proxy server would be cool to have for debugging purposes and for the support teams to have a look at, but I don't know whether that's really feasible to do. I get enough from the log files themselves."
"Implementation is always tailored to the customer and the kind of information we need from the client to carry it out can make them very uncomfortable. Sometimes the clients are not ready to share it."
"Zabbix could improve when it comes to large-scale use cases. Additionally, the inventory could be better when connecting to other solutions, such as ServiceNow. There show to be better integration with other platforms and storage."
Earn 20 points
Centerity Monitor is ranked 68th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring while Zabbix is ranked 1st in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 101 reviews. Centerity Monitor is rated 7.0, while Zabbix is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Centerity Monitor writes "A user-friendly solution that comes with a valuable machine learning feature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zabbix writes "Allows any number of customizations but lacks functionality for finding root causes". Centerity Monitor is most compared with Nagios XI, whereas Zabbix is most compared with Centreon, Checkmk, SolarWinds NPM, Nagios Core and Nagios XI. See our Centerity Monitor vs. Zabbix report.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.