We performed a comparison between CentOS and Google Chrome Enterprise based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Operating Systems (OS) for Business solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of CentOS is the speed and it is very easy to use."
"The product's initial setup phase was straightforward and not complex, especially if you are familiar with CLI."
"The most valuable feature is that it is compatible with RedHat."
"It's less expensive than Red Hat."
"The solution is productive."
"The latest version of this solution has everything built in, making it comprehensive and very easy to use."
"The open architecture is useful for us. That's why we're using CentOS."
"It's easy to install."
"The solution has been stable."
"Chrome functions as a comprehensive solution due to its continuous self-evaluation and improvement. The evolution process has been significant, with a notable distance covered from its inception to the present. Notably, features like VPN support have been incorporated over time, enhancing the platform's capabilities. A distinctive feature is that users don't even need to know the Wi-Fi password; upon signing into the machine, internet connectivity is established immediately. Furthermore, the cloud storage system ensures data isn't stored locally, making it seamless for users to switch between machines. In summary, Google Chrome Enterprise is an excellent solution, particularly when there's a shortage of available manpower."
"Google Sheets and Google Docs are the most valuable features of the solution."
"It has been working pretty well for us...By and large, things are pretty stable."
"This solution is user-friendly with security features detecting if there is suspicious activity on the browser. There is a lot of extensions we can use to provide us with good coverage."
"Chrome Enterprise is really easy to deploy and manage."
"We use the product to run applications and devices."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"I would like the integration to be more secure."
"If CentOS could add Office features then that would be beneficial. Additionally, the UI could improve."
"The product lacks a graphical user interface that can help users automate certain systems using the native features offered by CentOS."
"It is challenging to scale the solution when we have to increase the storage capacity from one end."
"Integration with other platforms could be improved."
"More security features could be included in the next release."
"As an open-source solution, there isn't much technical support."
"Updates are going to a streaming version."
"The solution's interface is an area with certain shortcomings that need improvement."
"Chromebooks are hard to find in the Indonesian market."
"The solution could be made cheaper."
"The performance could be faster."
"They need to deal with their memory management."
"Additional data security and data privacy features could be proactively recommended by Google."
"The tool is not very user-friendly."
"Setting up anything resembling a shared inbox is still kind of a giant pain in the solution."
CentOS is ranked 5th in Operating Systems (OS) for Business with 63 reviews while Google Chrome Enterprise is ranked 9th in Operating Systems (OS) for Business with 15 reviews. CentOS is rated 8.2, while Google Chrome Enterprise is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of CentOS writes "Allows you to securely store data, and command prompts make it simple to use". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Google Chrome Enterprise writes "A scalable solution that allows its users to create, share and edit documents internally within an organization". CentOS is most compared with Oracle Linux, Ubuntu Linux, Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), Windows Server and SUSE Linux Enterprise, whereas Google Chrome Enterprise is most compared with Island, Avira Secure Browser, Talon, Windows 10 and Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL). See our CentOS vs. Google Chrome Enterprise report.
See our list of best Operating Systems (OS) for Business vendors.
We monitor all Operating Systems (OS) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
