We performed a comparison between Change Auditor for Windows File Servers and IBM Security QRadar based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, Datadog and others in Log Management."The solution's most valuable aspect is that it can be fully integrated with Microsoft solutions and it doesn't impact the productivity order."
"In terms of features, the querying is great."
"Log correlation is very useful for processing alerts. It serves to follow up alerts in real-time, building an entire workflow."
"What I like the most about it is that you can very easily install and configure it. As compared to other SIEM solutions, for which you need to know and do a lot more to prepare your SIEM environment, QRadar is much simpler to install and configure. There are various options in the Admin console. In the Admin tab, you can design dashboards and view various graphs. It has a lot of attractive features, and you don't need to configure everything on your own."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is its artificial intelligence component, Watson. Its contribution is pretty good from a machine-learning artificial intelligence perspective. This compliments the orchestration automation component, as well."
"The scalability is awesome, because QRadar includes other solutions in the same console."
"The solution is relatively easy to use."
"The ability to add extensions is the most valuable feature. For example, extensions that provide valuable test ports."
"The scalability is good."
"This solution provides me with various alarms, and I have found security issues with some of my other products."
"The customer service and support could improve their approach to questioning issues. They tend to ask questions one at a time, which creates a lot of back-and-forth communication."
"The pricing could be improved. It needs to be reduced."
"The implementation and configuration are not easy."
"The implementation of the solution's technology needs to be simplified."
"The user interface is a bit difficult to get used to."
"The pricing of the solution is a bit high. If they could lower it, that would be ideal."
"From a functionality point of view there are issues sometimes."
"QRadar needs to be more specialized, along the lines of what other SIEM solutions are."
"The price of IBM Security QRadar is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"Pricing model could be more cost-effective."
More Change Auditor for Windows File Servers Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Change Auditor for Windows File Servers is ranked 55th in Log Management with 2 reviews while IBM Security QRadar is ranked 6th in Log Management with 198 reviews. Change Auditor for Windows File Servers is rated 9.0, while IBM Security QRadar is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Change Auditor for Windows File Servers writes "Provides granular queries of security logs and real-time alerting helps me mitigate risks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Security QRadar writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that provides good technical support". Change Auditor for Windows File Servers is most compared with Quest InTrust, Wazuh and Splunk Enterprise Security, whereas IBM Security QRadar is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM and Elastic Security.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.