We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management and Lacework based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management is known for its extensive data protection, incident identification, and detailed reporting. It includes IAM role control and compliance features. Lacework is highly regarded for its machine-learning anomaly detection and agent-based vulnerability management. It offers compliance reports and continuous monitoring. Check Point could enhance reporting options, vulnerability assessments, and integration with other tools. Lacework requires improvement in visibility and compliance-related metrics.
Service and Support: Some Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management customers expressed satisfaction, but others found technical support lacking at times. Lacework's support has garnered overwhelmingly positive reviews. Customers appreciate their promptness and proactive approach.
Ease of Deployment: The setup process for Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management is fast and straightforward, whereas Lacework's setup may take a few weeks to complete.
Pricing: Some users say Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management is reasonably priced and seamless to integrate with the public cloud. Others view it as costly. Lacework has a fixed annual fee and no extra charges. Users have generally had a positive and fair experience with Lacework's pricing and licensing.
ROI: Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management has been praised for its ability to help with compliance programs. Lacework has been commended for its positive ROI achieved through reducing monitoring efforts and automating ticket generation.
Comparison Results: Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management is preferred over Lacework. Users appreciate its comprehensive data security and protection. CloudGuard offers a complete 360 view of customers' entire cloud infrastructure. It is commended for its granular reporting, ruleset customization, IAM role control, and embedded machine learning for real-time attack prevention. The intuitive dashboard, powerful reporting, and ability to enhance security are also highly praised. Users say Lacework needs improvements in visibility, compliance metrics, and integration with other systems.
"We like PingSafe's vulnerability assessment and management features, and its vulnerability databases."
"It is fairly simple. Anybody can use it."
"PingSafe's most valuable feature is its unified console."
"With PingSafe, it's easy to onboard new accounts."
"Atlas security graph is pretty cool. It maps out relationships between components on AWS, like load balancers and servers. This helps visualize potential attack paths and even suggests attack paths a malicious actor might take."
"The dashboard gives me an overview of all the things happening in the product, making it one of the tool's best features."
"Support has been very helpful and provides regular feedback and help whenever needed. They've been very useful."
"PingSafe can integrate all your cloud accounts and resources you create in the AWS account, We have set it up to scan the AWS transfer services, EC2, security groups, and GitHub."
"It helps us to analyze vulnerabilities way before they get installed in production and the web. It gives us more security in the production environment."
"It offers advanced detection of threats that can harm data from the cloud database."
"The tool is also very intuitive; its dashboards are very complete and provide a lot of valuable information for decision-making to improve security."
"This platform has allowed us to collect data from multiple sources, centralizing everything under a single source."
"It offers a range of features tailored to address the unique security challenges."
"The ability to integrate it with Microsoft Azure Sentinel allows us to validate the logs in an even more complex and meaningful way."
"It presents great visibility of the traffic flow of our cloud, providing information on what data and users are circulating and in the event of a threat, it immediately identifies them by providing detailed and granular information from our entire environment."
"Alerts of cloud activity happening across all accounts is helpful."
"The most valuable feature, from a compliance perspective, is the ability to use Lacework as a platform for multiple compliance standards. We have to meet multiple standards like PCI, SOC 2, CIS, and whatever else is out there. The ability to have reports generated, per security standard, is one of the best features for me."
"The compliance reports are definitely most valuable because they save time and are accurate. So, instead of relying on a human going through and checking or providing me with a report, I could just log into Lacework and see for myself."
"For the most part, out-of-the-box, it tells you right away about the things you need to work on. I like the fact that it prioritizes alerts based on severity, so that you can focus your efforts on anything that would be critical/high first, moderate second, and work your way down, trying to continue to improve your security posture."
"Lacework is helping a lot in reducing the noise of the alerts. Usually, whenever you have a tool in place, you have a lot of noise in terms of alerts, but the time for an engineer to look into those alerts is limited. Lacework is helping us to consolidate the information that we are getting from the agents and other sources. We are able to focus only on the things that matter, which is the most valuable thing for us. It saves time, and for investigations, we have the right context to take action."
"The most valuable feature is Lacework's ability to distill all the security and audit logs. I recommend it to my customers. Normally, when I consult for other customers that are getting into the cloud, we use native security tools. It's more of a rule-based engine."
"The best feature, in my opinion, is the ease of use."
"There are many valuable features that I use in my daily work. The first are alerts and the event dossier that it generates, based on the severity. That is very insightful and helps me to have a security cap in our infrastructure. The second thing I like is the agent-based vulnerability management, which is the most accurate information."
"The most valuable aspects are identifying vulnerabilities—things that are out there that we aren't aware of—as well as finding what path of access attackers could use, and being able to see open SSL or S3 buckets and the like."
"We are experiencing problems with Cloud Native Security reporting."
"Bugs need to be disclosed quickly."
"There is room for improvement in the current active licensing model for PingSafe."
"The recommended actions aren't always specific, so it might suggest recommendations that don't apply to the particular infrastructure code I'm reviewing."
"PingSafe's current documentation could be improved to better assist customers during the cluster onboarding process."
"The Automation tab is an add-on that doesn’t work properly. They provide a list of scripts that don’t work and I have asked support to assist but they won’t help. When running on various endpoints the script doesn’t work and if it does, it’s only a couple. There are a lot of useful scripts that would be beneficial to run forensics, event logs, and process lists running on the endpoint."
"It took us a while to configure the software to work well in this type of environment, as the support documents were not always clear."
"One area for improvement could be the internal analysis process, specifically the guidance provided for remediation."
"I would like to see tighter integration with other compliance tools, like Chef Compliance, in addition to Inspector."
"The accuracy of its remediation is a 7.5 out of 10. Before, I would have given it a ten but now, to handle remediation for fully qualified domain names, it's not working as it did in the past. We're finding some difficulties there."
"The solution could be improved with a greater analysis of its Microsoft Security score."
"Almost all features are good, however, they still require improvements to the code security portion on which integration with the major source code repository is required."
"We were demotivated by the lack of native automation modules for the Terraform and Ansible tools."
"Making basic rules is easy, but it's complex if you want to do something a little more nuanced. I've been unable to make some rules that I wanted. I couldn't evaluate some values or parameters of the components I look for. I haven't always been able to assess them."
"One feature of the product that I would like to enhance is the possibility to connect to vulnerability management platforms so that the issues that emerge from the scans can then be ingested directly into the vulnerability management process."
"The support must be more effective."
"A feature that I have requested from them is the ability to sort alerts and policies based on a security framework. Right now, when you go into alerts, you have hundreds and hundreds of them that you have to manually pick. It would be useful to have categories for CIS Benchmark or SOC 2 and be able to display all the alerts and policies for one security framework."
"Visibility is lacking, and both compliance-related metrics and IAM security control could be improved."
"The biggest thing I would like to see improved is for them to pursue and obtain a FedRAMP moderate authorization... I don't believe they have any immediate plans to get FedRAMP moderate authorized, which is a bit of a challenge for us because we can only use Lacework in our commercial environment."
"Its integrations with third-party SIEMs can be better. That is one of the things that we discussed with them."
"There are a couple of the difficulties we encounter in the realm of cybersecurity, or security as a whole, that relate to potentially limited clarity. Having the capacity to perceive the configuration aspect and having the ability to contribute to it holds substantial advantages, in my view. It ranks high, primarily due to its role in guaranteeing compliance and the potential to uncover vulnerabilities, which could infiltrate the system and introduce potential risks. I had been exploring a specific feature that captured my interest. However, just yesterday, I participated in a product update session that announced the imminent arrival of this feature. The feature involves real-time alerting. This was something I had been anticipating, and it seems that this capability is now being integrated, possibly as part of threat intelligence. While anomaly events consistently and promptly appear in the console, certain alerts tend to experience delays before being displayed. Yet, with the recent product update, this issue is expected to be resolved. Currently, a comprehensive view of all policies is available within the console. However, I want a more tailored display of my compliance posture, focusing specifically on policies relevant to me. For instance, if I'm not subject to HIPAA regulations, I'd prefer not to see the HIPAA compliance details. It's worth noting that even with this request, there exists a filtering mechanism to control the type of compliance information visible. This flexibility provides a workaround to my preference, which is why it's challenging for me to definitively state my exact request."
"I would like to see a remote access assistance feature. And the threat-hunting platform could be better."
"Lacework has not reduced the number of alerts we get. We've actually had to add resources as a result of using it because the application requires a lot of people to understand it to get the value out of it properly."
"Lacework lacks remediation features, but I believe they're working on that. They're focused on the reporting aspect, but other features need to improve. They're also adding some compliance features, so it's not worth saying they need to get better at it."
More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is ranked 6th in Vulnerability Management with 64 reviews while Lacework is ranked 10th in Vulnerability Management with 9 reviews. Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is rated 8.6, while Lacework is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP writes "Threat intel integration provides us visibility in case any workload is communicating with suspicious or blacklisted IPs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Lacework writes "Makes us aware of vulnerabilities and provides a lot of data but it's not easily understood at first look". Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, AWS GuardDuty, Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Qualys VMDR, whereas Lacework is most compared with Wiz, AWS GuardDuty, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Snyk and Microsoft Defender for Cloud. See our Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs. Lacework report.
See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors, best Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) vendors, and best Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) vendors.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
