We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management and Orca Security based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Orca Security is strong in container security and has an easy-to-use compliance dashboard. Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management provides comprehensive 360 security and detailed reports and recommendations for errors. Orca Security could increase its coverage and provide code-level security checks, while also improving its collaboration with third-party vendors. Meanwhile, Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management should enhance its reporting options, lower its price, and enhance its ability to investigate security events.
Service and Support: Orca Security's customer service receives positive feedback for their efficient and knowledgeable technical support staff, fast response times, and openness to receive feedback. In comparison, Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management has a mixed reputation, with some satisfied customers and others expressing dissatisfaction with technical support.
Ease of Deployment: Orca Security's initial setup is user-friendly, agentless, efficient, and requires minimal maintenance compared to Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management. While Check Point's setup is generally simple, it may require professional deployment and team collaboration.
Pricing: Orca Security has a straightforward and reasonable pricing system for setup costs, which includes all standard licensing fees and does not require any additional expenses for networking or computing. In comparison, Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management has a variable pricing and licensing system that is viewed differently by different users. While some consider the setup cost to be manageable and simple, others find it costly. CloudGuard's licensing model is based on the cloud infrastructure's size, which is seen by some as rigid and expensive.
ROI: Orca Security saves users money by replacing multiple solutions and offering a deep view into the environment with minimal IT knowledge required. On the other hand, Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management is priced higher but offers security and compliance solutions that can result in a 35% ROI growth rate.
Comparison Results: Orca Security is a preferred option over Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management due to its agentless approach, user-friendly interface, and competitive pricing. Its SideScanning feature is particularly impressive, providing excellent visibility into cloud environments. On the other hand, Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management has received mixed reviews regarding its customer service and support, and its pricing is considered expensive by some users.
"We like PingSafe's vulnerability assessment and management features, and its vulnerability databases."
"The solution's most valuable features are its ability to detect vulnerabilities inside AWS resources and its ability to rescan after a specific duration set by the administrator."
"Cloud Native Security's most valuable features include cloud misconfiguration detection and remediation, compliance monitoring, a robust authentication security engine, and cloud threat detection and response capabilities."
"The cloud misconfiguration is the most valuable feature."
"PingSafe offers three key features: vulnerability management notifications, cloud configuration assistance, and security scanning."
"Cloud Native Security is a tool that has good monitoring features."
"The solution helped free other staff to work on other projects or other tasks. We basically just had to do a bunch of upfront configuring. With it, we do not have to spend as much time in the console."
"The UI is very good."
"The reporting against compliance is an important feature that helps you comply with policies and standards within your organization."
"The most valuable features are the ability to create pipeline rules, the enhanced NetOps security, and the deep visibility across our entire infrastructure."
"The dashboard is intuitive. You know if you're compliant or not, and then it gives you a remediation plan."
"Alerts of cloud activity happening across all accounts is helpful."
"The ability to integrate it with Microsoft Azure Sentinel allows us to validate the logs in an even more complex and meaningful way."
"Checkpoint posture management gives you visibility across your entire cloud infrastructure, so it helps you with management, maintenance, and compliance. With visibility across all these cloud platforms, you can protect against compromised credentials or identity theft."
"Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP's initial configuration is very easy. It is plug-and-play. It also gives regular updates."
"Visibility is a key feature. It helps me to validate my overall network posture."
"Another valuable feature with Orca, something that's not talked about enough, is its ability to rank your gaps and your tasks... You can get visibility with agents and there are a lot of ways to do that. But the ranking and the context across the entire environment, that is what is unique about Orca."
"The reporting and automated remediation capabilities are valuable to me. They're real game-changers."
"Orca Security has patented technologies. It's an agentless solution, so you don't need to install an agent. Instead, it contacts your account provider and fetches metadata, eliminating the need for snapshots or reserved space to copy client infrastructure."
"Orca's SideScanning is the biggest feature. It's the 'wow' factor... With Orca's SideScanning, they just need permissions for your account and that makes it so simple."
"Orca provides X-ray vision into everything within the cloud properties, whereas normally, this would require multiple tools."
"It's for protection. It's an agentless tool. We don't need to install anything at a customer's premises. We can just scan the entire assets in the cloud."
"The initial setup is very easy."
"Orca Security has updated its interface, making it more user-friendly. I find it particularly useful as it allows me to easily navigate the dashboard and prioritize actions based on severity and criticality."
"There is no break-glass account feature. They should implement this as soon as possible because we can't implement SSO without a break-glass feature."
"The main area for improvement I want to see is for the platform to become less resource-intensive. Right now, it can slow down processes on the machine, and it would be a massive improvement if it were more lightweight than it currently is."
"We use PingSafe and also SentinelOne. If PingSafe integrated some of the endpoint security features of SentinelOne, it would be the perfect one-stop solution for everything. We wouldn't need to switch between the products. At my organization, I am responsible for endpoint security and vulnerability management. Integrating both functions into one application would be ideal because I could see all the alerts, heat maps, and reports in one console."
"While it is good, I think the solution's console could be improved."
"Currently, we would have to export our vulnerability report to an .xlsx file, and review it in an Excel spreadsheet, and then we sort of compile a list from there. It would be cool if there was a way to actually toggle multiple applications for review and then see those file paths on multiple users rather than only one user at a time or only one application at a time."
"I used to work on AWS. At times, I would generate a normal bug in my system, and then I would check PingSafe. The alert used to come after about three and a half hours. It used to take that long to generate the alert about the vulnerability in my system. If a hacker attacks a system and PingSafe takes three to four hours to generate an alert, it will not be beneficial for the company. It would be helpful if we get the alert in five to ten minutes."
"The alerting system of the product is an area that I look at and sometimes get confused about. I feel the alerting feature needs improvement."
"There is room for improvement in the current active licensing model for PingSafe."
"Making basic rules is easy, but it's complex if you want to do something a little more nuanced. I've been unable to make some rules that I wanted. I couldn't evaluate some values or parameters of the components I look for. I haven't always been able to assess them."
"The reporting has a lot of opportunities to continuously improve so that we can continue to show value."
"The license cost is expensive and has room for improvement."
"The tool has a lot of potential, but today, it lacks a lot of Scripts/Bots for Azure."
"There are opportunities for improvement that can be addressed through a roadmap."
"CloudGuard could be more customizable. It has built-in standards for things like GDPR compliance. But depending on your business lane, you might want to build your own controls based on your own standards."
"The main issue that we found with Dome9 is that we have a default rule set with better recommendations that we want to use. So, you do a clone of that rule set, then you do some tweaks and customizations, but there is a problem. When they activate the default rule set with the recommendations and new security measures, it doesn't apply the new security measures to your clones profile. Therefore, you need to clone the profile again. We are already writing a report to Check Point."
"The performance can be better. Sometimes, the performance is not up to the mark. There is also integration complexity with third-party software and tools."
"The interface can be a bit cranky and sometimes takes a lot of time to load."
"Another improvement would be that, in addition to focusing on endpoint compliance, they would focus on general compliance."
"It's not all clouds that they are currently onboarded with. For instance, they are not yet with public cloud and many other private clouds."
"I would be happy if they offered more automatic remediation options. They're working on that, but the more the better. For example, if they want you to harden a server, they would offer a hardening script that would be more aware of what's going on."
"They can expand a little bit in anti-malware detection. While we have pretty good confidence that it's going to detect some of the static malware, some of the detections are heuristics. There could be a growth in the library from where they're pulling their information, but we don't get a lot of those alerts based on the design of our products. In general, that might be an area that needs to be filled since they offer it as a service within it."
"I would like to see better customization options for security frameworks and better integration with reporting tools like Power BI or Grafana dashboards."
"The solution could improve by making the dashboards more elaborative and more descriptive."
"I would like to see an option to do security checks on a code level. This is possible because they have access to all of the code running in the cloud provider, and combining their site-scanning solution with that would be a nice add-on."
More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is ranked 4th in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) with 64 reviews while Orca Security is ranked 9th in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) with 15 reviews. Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is rated 8.6, while Orca Security is rated 9.4. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP writes "Threat intel integration provides us visibility in case any workload is communicating with suspicious or blacklisted IPs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Orca Security writes "Allows agentless data collection directly from the cloud". Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, AWS GuardDuty, Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Sysdig Secure, whereas Orca Security is most compared with Wiz, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security and Trend Vision One - Cloud Security. See our Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs. Orca Security report.
See our list of best Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) vendors, best Vulnerability Management vendors, and best Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
