We performed a comparison between Checkmarx One and Microsoft Azure Application Gateway based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools."The most valuable features of Checkmarx are the SCA module and the code-checking module. Additionally, the solutions are explanatory and helpful."
"The administration in Checkmarx is very good."
"The report function is the solution's greatest asset."
"The most valuable feature is the simple user interface."
"The most valuable features of Checkmarx are the Best Fix Location and the Payments option because you can save a lot of time trying to mitigate the configuration. Using these tools can save you a lot of time."
"The setup is very easy. There is a lot of information in the documents which makes the install not difficult at all."
"Both automatic and manual code review (CxQL) are valuable."
"The solution has good performance, it is able to compute in 10 to 15 minutes."
"The security feature in all the layers of the application is the most valuable."
"Good customization; able to report and take action on alerts."
"The tool helps manage microservices by providing developers with a platform to conduct tests and assessments on the web application. The custom domain option is one of the most valuable features I've found. This feature is incredibly helpful for the end-users of the web application. With the custom domain feature, you can change the lengthy link to a shorter, more memorable one. For example, instead of using a lengthy default link, you can customize it to something like imail.com, which is much easier to remember and share."
"Application Gateway automatically redirects unwanted users and takes care of the security aspect. It also handles the performance side of things, which is why we use it."
"The simplicity of the solution and its ability to integrate easily with others are its most valuable aspects."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the web application firewall (WAF)."
"Using policies to link and manage these URL-based routing configurations is also valuable."
"I like the tool's stability and performance."
"Meta data is always needed."
"Some of the descriptions were found to be missing or were not as elaborate as compared to other descriptions. Although, they could be found across various standard sources but it would save a lot of time for developers, if this was fixed."
"We have received some feedback from our customers who are receiving a large number of false positives."
"Checkmarx could improve by reducing the price."
"It provides us with quite a handful of false positive issues. If Checkmarx could reduce this number, it would be a great tool to use."
"If it is a very large code base then we have a problem where we cannot scan it."
"The cost per user is high and should be reduced."
"I would like to see the DAST solution in the future."
"There is room for improvement in the pricing model."
"It does not have the flexibility for using public IPs in version 2."
"In the next release, the solution could improve the integration with Service Mesh and other Azure Security Services."
"The support provided for the solution has certain shortcomings that need improvement, especially when it comes to the response time from the support team."
"The graphical interface needs improvement because it is not user friendly."
"The security of the product could be adjusted."
"Microsoft Azure Application Gateway could improve by allowing features to use more third-party tools."
"The solution has many limitations. You cannot upgrade the VPN to the application gateway. So I started with version one, which has limited capabilities, and they provided version two. And unfortunately, I cannot upgrade from v one to v two like other services. So I have to decommission the version one and create a new one with version two. Also the version one was complex with the certificates uploading the SQL certificates."
More Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Pricing and Cost Advice →
Checkmarx One is ranked 3rd in Application Security Tools with 67 reviews while Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is ranked 4th in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) with 41 reviews. Checkmarx One is rated 7.6, while Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Checkmarx One writes "The report function is a great, configurable asset but sometimes yields false positives". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway writes "High stability with built-in rules that reduce alerts and are easy to configure". Checkmarx One is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Fortify on Demand, Snyk and Coverity, whereas Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is most compared with F5 Advanced WAF, Citrix NetScaler, AWS WAF, Cloudflare Web Application Firewall and Azure Front Door.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
