We performed a comparison between Cisco Enterprise Routers and HPE Enterprise Routers based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Routers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has good performance."
"It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"Stable and scalable routers."
"The most valuable features are that it is more secure and easy to operate."
"Flexibility is the most valuable feature of this solution."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is its ability to implement layer three protocols and layer two protocols like OSPS in BSS and BSC environments, with the Nexus Cisco 7000."
"The most valuable features are security and throughput."
"The most valuable feature is the command prompt, which is very user-friendly."
"This solution helps us with our inter-network constitution, and that works for us."
"The commands are easy to understand."
"It is more durable than other products in the market."
"It has good scalability."
"HPE routers are easier to manage than any other router I've used."
"It makes it easy to update the network technology and manage multiple deals, all without needing technical knowledge."
"Extensive support for cellular range for Wi-Fi technologies"
"These routers help us to provide high availability to our clusters."
"The solution's initial setup is straightforward."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"I would like to see support for software-defined networking."
"The price could be better."
"Cisco has acquired other companies, and due to this, there are many API-based integrations. There should be one platform that will enable a smooth integration. For example, Cisco acquired ThousandEyes, AppDynamics and Viptela. These are ideal solutions for big companies in terms of WAN connectivity. Cisco needs to ensure that there is a smooth integration mechanism in order to ease this process or point of integration."
"They need to improve cost efficiency."
"The solution is expensive and difficult to manage."
"The lead times are extremely high. Normally, it's six to eight months initially, and they prolong it to up to one year for new device delivery by Cisco."
"I would like to see the setup time reduced."
"The UI could be more user-friendly."
"Compatibility with other platforms could be improved."
"I'd like to see more security features, like support for different types of encryptions."
"Technical support could be better."
"Better management tools are needed."
"They should work on lowering their prices in Brazil to stay competitive with rivals and offer customers more affordable options."
"The solution is expensive."
"Its customer service could be better for older equipment models."
Cisco Enterprise Routers is ranked 2nd in Routers with 101 reviews while HPE Enterprise Routers is ranked 6th in Routers with 7 reviews. Cisco Enterprise Routers is rated 8.6, while HPE Enterprise Routers is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cisco Enterprise Routers writes "Allows us to configure NAS through Cisco activities and to create GRE channels with different sites". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE Enterprise Routers writes "Durable and reliable with good networking capabilities". Cisco Enterprise Routers is most compared with MikroTik Routers and Switches, Huawei Enterprise Routers, Juniper MX Series Routers, OneAccess Enterprise Routers and MikroTik Cloud Router Switch, whereas HPE Enterprise Routers is most compared with Huawei Enterprise Routers, MikroTik Routers and Switches, Juniper MX Series Routers and Cisco Cloud Services Router. See our Cisco Enterprise Routers vs. HPE Enterprise Routers report.
See our list of best Routers vendors.
We monitor all Routers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
