We performed a comparison between CloverETL and Talend Open Studio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Server features for scheduler: It is very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them. The interface is easy to use."
"No dependence on native language and ease of use."
"Key features include wealth of pre-defined components; all components are customizable; descriptive logging, especially for error messages."
"Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility."
"The most valuable features of Talend Open Studio are customization and integration."
"The most valuable feature of Talend Open Studio is the tMap component. There is a lot of functionality in one component."
"The initial setup was quite straightforward. The deployment took between two and three days."
"The most valuable features are definitely data integration, data preparation, and data stewardship."
"The data integration aspect of the solution is excellent."
"I didn't have many problems installing it. It seemed very straightforward to me."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"The best thing I have found with Talend Open Studio is their major support for the lookups."
"Needs: easier automated failure recovery; more, and more intuitive auto-generated/filled-in code for components; easier/more automated sync between CloverETL Designer and CloverETL Server."
"Its documentation could be improved."
"Resource management: We typically run out of heap space, and even the allocation of high heap space does not seem to be enough."
"It is complicated to understand the configuration process for email components."
"The high price of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The user interface could be made simpler."
"The technical support and documentation need a lot of work to come up to standard."
"he overall marketing and documentation of this product need to improve a lot."
"The server-side should be completely revamped."
"If I compare Open Studion to other solutions, their interface is robust but not so fancy looking. This is an area that could use improvement. I would like to see an updated interface."
"Talend Open Studio has a lot of capabilities, but there is some restriction. For example, if we want to connect to an SAP system, Open Studio cannot do it. We need to go with an enterprise version. Additionally, the monitoring features could improve."
Earn 20 points
CloverETL is ranked 60th in Data Integration while Talend Open Studio is ranked 5th in Data Integration with 48 reviews. CloverETL is rated 7.0, while Talend Open Studio is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CloverETL writes "Provides wealth of pre-defined, customizable components, and descriptive logging for errors". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Talend Open Studio writes "Intuitive interface and documentation make it simple to build jobs and APIs and logging helps pinpoint and resolve issues quickly". CloverETL is most compared with SSIS and iWay Universal Adapter Framework, whereas Talend Open Studio is most compared with SSIS, IBM InfoSphere DataStage, Talend Data Fabric, Talend Data Management Platform and Informatica PowerCenter. See our CloverETL vs. Talend Open Studio report.
See our list of best Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.