We performed a comparison between Collibra Governance and SAS Data Governance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Collibra, Informatica and others in Data Governance."Collibra Governance is a stable solution."
"There is a good community setup around the solution that can provide insights."
"Workflow is very helpful and assessment are good features. I really like the structure of this solution and how it is compartmentalized."
"We have folks in the field doing our clinical research operations, and they have the opportunity to refer to Collibra when they are examining a particular report. When they have a question about how something in that report is derived, they can pull a metric that is defined fully in Collibra. They have the opportunity to drill back into Collibra to see that."
"The most valuable feature is the Technical Lineage. The fact that you can trace the auditability of a particular field or attribute across various systems is very useful."
"Collibra's lineage is a very powerful feature. We have integrated Collibra with Azure and ADLS storage and we create lineage diagrams using the two tools."
"The most important feature in Collibra Governance is the ability to gather data or a collection of data into one repository. If a client creates a repository at his place, then it will get updated to the cloud automatically."
"The workflow is very good and has been embedded. It also has a great user interface."
"It is a very professional product. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"We would like to have out-of-the-box automation."
"Collibra is not very user-friendly in terms of lineage generation. The lineage generation process is quite tough, and it takes lots of time to understand it. Business staff are also struggling to generate lineages and to understand them. So, it is not very user-friendly."
"Sometimes, if a client needs a specific customization, we cannot do it directly. The client needs to reach out to Collibra and request the customization."
"The solution's data lineage is a little difficult and will not support all the source systems on the database."
"Certain implementations, including lineage maps, could be user-friendly."
"The licensing is one area that could get improved."
"What I use it for is fairly rudimentary, and I don't have any complaints about it. I haven't tried to stretch the boundaries at all, but it would be nice if there were capabilities built within the system to somehow help enforce the quality and consistency across related elements that are built in the catalog. It could have intelligent capabilities built in to help maintain the quality of the data and information, such as natural language processing, machine learning, and so on."
"This solution could be improved with the the addition of process diagrams to help the many users of the platform understand all the fields."
"In today's time, to be competitive, the solution's price should be lowered."
Collibra Governance is ranked 2nd in Data Governance with 41 reviews while SAS Data Governance is ranked 15th in Data Governance with 1 review. Collibra Governance is rated 7.6, while SAS Data Governance is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Collibra Governance writes "Transformed our cross-functional business teams into one enterprise-facing view". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAS Data Governance writes "An exceptionally stable and scalable product that helps businesses in the area of data integrity". Collibra Governance is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Governance, Informatica Axon, Alation Data Catalog, BigID and Ataccama ONE Platform, whereas SAS Data Governance is most compared with .
See our list of best Data Governance vendors.
We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.