We performed a comparison between Coralogix and Splunk Cloud Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is easy to use and to start with."
"The solution offers very good convenience filtering."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"A non-tech person can easily get used to it."
"Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams."
"The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces."
"In my organization, Splunk Cloud Platform has improved the issue revolving around transactions."
"I like the Cloud monitoring console feature."
"I like the fact that we do not have to maintain all the cloud infrastructure. That is probably the main thing about the Splunk Cloud Platform."
"We haven't had any limitations or problems connecting to our network devices."
"I can trace an event back to its root cause. I can find the root cause instead of just looking at the symptoms across different things."
"Dashboards and alerting are the most valuable features. The dashboards let us see how the system looks in terms of anomalies, and the alerts trigger us to go and look at what possible problems are happening."
"The most valuable feature of Splunk Cloud is the quick setup."
"The most valuable feature is we don't have to deal with any back-end server maintenance because the solution is cloud-based."
"We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change."
"Maybe they could make it more user-friendly."
"The user interface could be more intuitive and explanatory."
"From my experience, Coralogix has horrible Terraform providers."
"The documentation of the tool could be improved"
"It would be helpful if Coralogix could integrate the main modules that any organization requires into a single subscription."
"Although there is documentation available, it is really hard for me to find relevant topics on what it is that I'm searching for."
"The only thing that is missing from Splunk Cloud is the command-line interface."
"The Splunk interface is on-premises, so we have limited access to Splunk Cloud. Splunk support is not so good on Splunk Cloud. The Splunk side of the Splunk Cloud should also be more customizable. Integrating Splunk UBA, Splunk Phantom, and Splunk Cloud is also a bit difficult."
"The Splunk Cloud Platform dashboard could benefit from some improvements."
"When it comes to the integrations with the other platforms, there is a little bit of a lag in the observability part, making it an area where improvements are required."
"The dashboards should be easier to customize."
"The administration could use improvement. We have to rely on support more often than we're used to."
"Support could be improved."
Coralogix is ranked 26th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 7 reviews while Splunk Cloud Platform is ranked 3rd in Data Visualization with 36 reviews. Coralogix is rated 8.4, while Splunk Cloud Platform is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Coralogix writes "Good capabilities, has a helpful interface and is straightforward to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk Cloud Platform writes "Does not require backend maintenance, is easily integrated and utilized". Coralogix is most compared with Datadog, Grafana, Sentry, New Relic and Elastic Search, whereas Splunk Cloud Platform is most compared with Wazuh, Splunk Enterprise Security, Fortinet FortiAnalyzer, AppInsights and Check Point Security Management. See our Coralogix vs. Splunk Cloud Platform report.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.