We performed a comparison between CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM)."The solution helps our developers access internal systems. It also helps us in Privilege Access Management."
"Automatic password management, which will automatically change passwords based on compliance requirements."
"Rather than multiple tools for maintaining regulatory compliance around passwords and privileged accounts, we have centralized as much as possible with CyberArk. This is now a one stop shop for end users to access their elevated credentials."
"Central Password Manager is useful for agentless automated password management through AD integration as well as endpoints for different devices."
"We can make a policy that affects everybody instantly."
"We are able to centrally manage credentials, touch applications, and rotate passwords."
"You can easily manage more than 4000 accounts with one PSM."
"The technical support is good."
"The ability to provide just-in-time privileged access and set specific parameters for access duration is highly beneficial."
"Make it easier to deploy."
"The solution could improve by adding more connectors."
"The lead product has a slow process. There are some reports and requirements from CyberArk which are not readily available as an applicable solution. We have made consistent management requests in the logs."
"I'm not a fan of technical support with CyberArk. It's like jumping through red tape and hoops. Quite frankly, it's almost like when you call CyberArk you get the Help Desk or the level-one. I'm a level-one. I got the CCD, I know how to do the initial troubleshooting. When I call CyberArk it's because I can't figure the problem out. So I need a level-two, three, four. I don't need you to tell me, "Hey, open a ticket and then give me logs.""
"The scalability, sometimes, is lacking. It works really well for more static environments... But for an environment where you're constantly spinning up new infrastructure or new endpoints, sometimes it has a hard time keeping up."
"I would like to see better usability for non-technical people."
"The product is very vaulting-focused. I'd love to see it expanding its capabilities a bit further into areas like just-in-time elevation, and access with non-vaulted credentials."
"The issue of technical support is crucial, as there are not many specialized partners available in Brazil to provide this service. While English language support is of good quality, there is a significant shortage of partners capable of meeting the demand locally."
"There's room for improvement in Microsoft's documentation, as it often lacks clarity."
More CyberArk Privileged Access Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is ranked 1st in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 144 reviews while Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management is ranked 12th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 1 review. CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is rated 8.8, while Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager writes "Lets you ensure relevant, compliant access in good time and with an audit trail, yet lacks clarity on MITRE ATT&CK". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management writes "Enhanced security and simplified management offering a centralized solution with granular settings". CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Microsoft Entra ID, Delinea Secret Server, WALLIX Bastion and One Identity Safeguard, whereas Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management is most compared with Delinea Privileged Access Service.
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.