We performed a comparison between Datadog and Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring."It helps us better manage our logs."
"The most valuable feature of Datadog is its logs."
"We like the distributed tracing and flame graphs for debugging. This has been invaluable for us during periods of high traffic or red alert conditions."
"Datadog provides tracing and logging, whereas Dynatrace focuses on tracing, and Splunk is more of a logging tool. Datadog's advantage is that we don't need two tools."
"Datadog has proven to be easy to set up and legible for both development and operational teams."
"It has enhanced the performance of my team."
"The most valuable features are logging, the extensive set of integrations, and easy jumpstart."
"The biggest thing I liked was the combination of all the things - monitoring, log aggregation, and profiling."
"Real-time alerting is a very important feature. We need alerts for everything. We have alarms setup and get alerts through email or third-party integrations depending on what's happening – critical VMs, high CPU usage, security concerns."
"Datadog has a lot of documentation, but a lot of that documentation assumes you know how the service works, which can lead to confusion."
"I would like testing for data in the future."
"The ability to find what you are looking for when starting out could be improved."
"It would be nice to be able to graph metrics by excluding certain tags (like you can do in monitors)."
"Its pricing model can be improved. Its settings should be improved for a better understanding of billing. They should also provide some alerts when there is an increase in the usage. For example, if there is 20% more increase from one week to another, the customer should get an alert."
"Geo-data is also something very critical that we hope to see in the future."
"We'd like Datadog to make the log storage cheaper."
"All solutions have some area to improve, and in Datadog they can improve their overall technology moving forward."
"Third-party connectivity is the part that needs improvement within Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service."
More Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Datadog is ranked 2nd in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 137 reviews while Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service is ranked 40th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 1 review. Datadog is rated 8.6, while Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Datadog writes "Very good RUM, synthetics, and infrastructure host maps". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service writes "Offers real-time alerting and dashboards are great for performance hubs of the database". Datadog is most compared with Dynatrace, Azure Monitor, New Relic, AWS X-Ray and Elastic Observability, whereas Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service is most compared with Zabbix, Nagios XI and Nagios Core.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.