We compared Dell Avamar and Dell PowerProtect Data Manager based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
In summary, both Dell Avamar and Dell PowerProtect Data Manager have been praised for their efficient data backup and recovery capabilities, user-friendly interfaces, and reliable performance. Dell Avamar is known for its strong customer service and support, while Dell PowerProtect Data Manager stands out for its seamless integration with existing systems and robust security measures. However, Dell Avamar could benefit from enhancements in its user interface and performance, while Dell PowerProtect Data Manager users have suggested improvements for a more intuitive interface and better documentation and support resources. Additionally, both products have been recognized for their reasonable pricing, setup cost, and flexible licensing options.
Features: Dell Avamar is praised for its efficient deduplication, excellent backup and recovery, and user-friendly interface. On the other hand, Dell PowerProtect Data Manager offers seamless integration, advanced analytics and reporting, robust security, and excellent customer support.
Pricing and ROI: The setup cost for Dell Avamar is considered competitive and reasonable, while users find it relatively straightforward and hassle-free. On the other hand, Dell PowerProtect Data Manager is positively received for its pricing, setup cost, and licensing. Users describe its setup cost as straightforward and hassle-free, with no complaints about high costs., Dell Avamar enhances data backup and recovery efficiency, improves storage efficiency, and offers scalability. Dell PowerProtect Data Manager streamlines data protection and recovery, optimizes data management efforts, and reduces business downtime.
Room for Improvement: Dell Avamar could benefit from enhancements in user interface and performance. Users need a more intuitive interface, faster backup and restore, better documentation, and technical support. Dell PowerProtect Data Manager needs an intuitive interface, better documentation, increased compatibility, improved performance, and reliability.
Deployment and customer support: The reviews for Dell Avamar mention varying durations for implementation, with some users taking three months for deployment and an additional week for setup. On the other hand, Dell PowerProtect Data Manager reviews also mention the same time durations, suggesting that the terms "deployment" and "setup" may refer to the same period for this product., Customers have expressed satisfaction with the customer service and support provided by both Dell Avamar and Dell PowerProtect Data Manager. However, Dell Avamar's team has been described as helpful, responsive, and efficient, while Dell PowerProtect Data Manager's support is praised for its smooth experience and promptness.
The summary above is based on 27 interviews we conducted recently with Dell Avamar and Dell PowerProtect Data Manager users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"The stability is okay."
"The solution is very stable."
"We used Dell Avamar for backup and recovery of a virtual environment."
"Stable and scalable backup and recovery software, with good technical support."
"The product has a proven track record of good backups without much of a failure ratio. It also has a good backup in terms of the compression ratio."
"The solution is very user-friendly."
"I have found the product to be scalable."
"Dell EMC Avamar is very good with endpoint backups."
"The deduplication is the most valuable feature because it helps to control the overhead."
"The solution adequately handles data storage."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"I would say flexibility is the most important feature of the product. The performance and speed are the best on the market."
"It's the perfect solution for virtual and container directives. The data reduction feature works well, and we haven't had any issues."
"One notable feature is its robust backup support for Kubernetes and container environments. Additionally, PPDM stands out for its ease of deployment and management compared to other backup solutions. It is highly user-friendly, allowing users to quickly learn and implement backup and restore processes within a week. PPDM represents the next generation of backup software and is comparable to offerings from other vendors. Furthermore, PPDM prioritizes security with various access controls, such as user and database access controls. Its deployment tool is also known for its simplicity."
"Dell PowerProtect Data Manager helps to reduce the amount of data being transferred and stored."
"Dell EMC PowerProtect Data Manager is user-friendly and easy to use. it does what it needs to do."
"It's not the best solution for big databases."
"Dell Avamar could improve by adding more backup features."
"It is very scalable, and that's its claim to fame, but that also makes it hard to make changes. Anytime there is a large piece of software, changing that piece of software is harder. You've got a larger install base, so you can't just rapidly change. We also use another product called Veeam, and it has this new feature called Continuous Data Protection, which basically lets you get very close to the way the system was in time. We have a system or two up there on which we have set 10 minutes Continuous Data Protection. So, we can roll it back to whatever it was 10 minutes ago, 20 minutes ago, or 30 minutes ago. This feature doesn't exist in Avamar Data Domain. That's the one feature I'd like to see first."
"Compared with Cohesity or Rubrik, which have some continuous data protection for backup and replication, this solution tends to lack in this area."
"I think they could also move more towards cloud solutions. It already has some cloud tiering, but I think that could be more extensive. They should work with all cloud providers and I think in the future they will be on all cloud platforms."
"Some customers need to back up to tape, but Avamar lacks support, so it costs a lot."
"Some integrations are not in place, such as the email alerts, which are not compatible with Office 365 SMTP gateway."
"The interface has room for improvement. It's not ideal right now."
"A lot of improvement is required in Dell's first level of support."
"The Dell EMC PowerProtect Data Manager reports could improve. There should be different kinds of reports on failures, such as dashboards that we can submit to top management or auditors."
"As a new product, there are some things that still need to improve a bit as it matures."
"There is always room for improvement. The compression ratio should be improved as well as the efficiency."
"They should include a feature similar to S3 bucket."
"Management is difficult and it is hard to determine when things aren't working properly."
"PPDM requires further development. It is primarily integrated with DevOps systems."
"You need to use additional software to back up entire environments. It will be good if they could support entire tape libraries."
More Dell PowerProtect Data Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
Dell Avamar is ranked 12th in Backup and Recovery with 81 reviews while Dell PowerProtect Data Manager is ranked 25th in Backup and Recovery with 9 reviews. Dell Avamar is rated 7.6, while Dell PowerProtect Data Manager is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Dell Avamar writes "Stable, integrates well with other solutions, and has a good price, but its UI needs a refresh". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Dell PowerProtect Data Manager writes "A tool that offers good capacity management and product management". Dell Avamar is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Dell NetWorker, Dell PowerProtect DP (IDPA), Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain) and Veritas NetBackup, whereas Dell PowerProtect Data Manager is most compared with Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain), Veeam Backup & Replication, Dell NetWorker, Dell PowerProtect DP (IDPA) and Rubrik. See our Dell Avamar vs. Dell PowerProtect Data Manager report.
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors and best Deduplication Software vendors.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.