We performed a comparison between Denodo and Teradata QueryGrid based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration."Denodo is very stable."
"The most valuable features are data lineage and the concept of a semantic layer."
"Denodo's best features are its performance, easy data transformation, and the job scheduler."
"The most valuable feature is Data Catalogs."
"The ability to connect to a lot of different sources."
"The performance and the speed to market are the most valuable features of this solution."
"It allows a lot of traceability and you can decide what data you want to collect"
"The logical data warehouse functionality is fantastic. It truly stands out. The ClearOptimizer and Virtual Cache are great features. They work together seamlessly to optimize performance."
"It is a highly robust software solution."
"Lacks integrations with AWS, GCP and the like."
"We occasionally have some integration issues that we need to work through."
"Denodo's training documentation could be improved by providing more material. From an administrative standpoint, I've found that only Denodo websites provide the usual tutorials. It may be because it's a bit of a restricted tool, but it results in trouble with learning. Normally, I can find help and solutions from other sources, but I haven't been able to find any for Denodo. Other that, it's fine and it performs well. I only have six months of experience, so I can't accurately suggest improvements."
"There are a couple of areas that can be improved in Denodo. From a stability point of view, sometimes we see issues in the data management functionality. This only happens now and then, however, and usually takes place when we add in our own customization."
"User-specific security at the column and row levels needs to be improved. Instead of applying security at every individual level, it would be better if it were at the group or tier level. It will save a lot of time."
"Sometimes, Windows-related functions do not work properly in Denodo. The analytic functions in SQL do not work properly."
"It would be good if the solution provided a much-needed cellular platform."
"Documentation needs to be improved"
"The primary challenge with Teradata lies in its cost structure, encompassing subscription fees, software licenses, and hardware expenses."
Denodo is ranked 12th in Data Integration with 29 reviews while Teradata QueryGrid is ranked 31st in Data Integration with 1 review. Denodo is rated 7.8, while Teradata QueryGrid is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Denodo writes "Saves our underwriters' time with data virtualization, but could provide more learning resources". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Teradata QueryGrid writes "Unified and efficient query processing that seamlessly integrates and analyzes data from heterogeneous sources". Denodo is most compared with Azure Data Factory, AWS Glue, Mule Anypoint Platform, Delphix and SSIS, whereas Teradata QueryGrid is most compared with Teradata Data Mover and IBM InfoSphere DataStage.
See our list of best Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.