Diamanti vs Kubernetes comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Diamanti Logo
417 views|325 comparisons
Kubernetes Logo
7,387 views|4,804 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Diamanti and Kubernetes based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Amazon Web Services (AWS), VMware and others in Container Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Container Management Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The management layer is free, which is perfect. You don't need to pay money for the management layer, but in AWS develop service, you need to pay. I think it is €75 per month for the management layer. It is free here, so you can have as many Kubernetes clusters as you need. You are paying just for the workload, that is, for the machine, CPU, memory, and everything."
  • "Kubernetes is open-source."
  • "The solution is affordable."
  • "Kubernetes is open source. But we have to manage Kubernetes as a team, and the overhead is a bit high. Compared with the platforms like Cloud Foundry, which has a much less operational overhead. Kubernetes, I have to manage the code, and I have to hire the developers. If someone has a product, a developer should know exactly what he's writing or high availability, and all those things may differ the costs."
  • "There are no licensing fees."
  • "There is no licensing fee."
  • "In addition to Kubernetes, you have to pay for support."
  • "The solution requires a license to use it."
  • More Kubernetes Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Management solutions are best for your needs.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:There are many good features. I feel that the scale-out features, like replica sets, are very good. The number of running containers can be autoscaled.
    Top Answer:I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, with ten being expensive. It's a bit costlier for smaller organizations. It's good for bigger organizations, but for smaller organizations or a few… more »
    Top Answer:Kubernetes is open source, which is both beneficial and negative depending on the responsibilities. Supported versions like Red Hat, Amazon, Microsoft, or Google are pricey. It's good for bigger… more »
    Ranking
    21st
    Views
    417
    Comparisons
    325
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    4th
    Views
    7,387
    Comparisons
    4,804
    Reviews
    38
    Average Words per Review
    494
    Rating
    8.7
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    K8
    Learn More
    Overview
    Diamanti appliance is purpose-built for containerized applications that combines the ease of hyperconverged infrastructure with the unparalleled performance and efficiency of bare-metal containers. Diamanti addresses the unique requirements of containerized applications, ensuring network interoperability and persistent storage. Diamanti virtualizes network and storage for containers using a built-in PCIe converged I/O controller in every appliance to guarantee application performance without code changes or customization. The PCIe architecture delivers order-of-magnitude latency improvement compared with traditional shared-storage systems and software overlays.

    Kubernetes (K8s) is an open-source system for automating deployment, scaling, and management of containerized applications.
    It groups containers that make up an application into logical units for easy management and discovery. Kubernetes builds upon 15 years of experience of running production workloads at Google, combined with best-of-breed ideas and practices from the community.

    Sample Customers
    Kubernetes, Mesosphere, NBC Universal, Red Hat
    China unicom, NetEase Cloud, Nav, AppDirect
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Educational Organization8%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company29%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Retailer12%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Government7%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise76%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise56%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise63%
    Buyer's Guide
    Container Management
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Amazon Web Services (AWS), VMware and others in Container Management. Updated: May 2024.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Diamanti is ranked 21st in Container Management while Kubernetes is ranked 4th in Container Management with 73 reviews. Diamanti is rated 0.0, while Kubernetes is rated 8.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kubernetes writes "Container orchestrator that deploys our machine learning solutions". Diamanti is most compared with Rancher Labs, Portworx Enterprise and Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform, whereas Kubernetes is most compared with VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE, Amazon EKS, Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform and Rancher Labs.

    See our list of best Container Management vendors.

    We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.