We performed a comparison between Digital.ai Application Security and SonarQube based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools."I used the tool to prepare for the interview as a Business Developer. It helped me improve my understanding on software security."
"The static code analysis is very good."
"I follow Quality Gate's graduation model within organization, and it is extremely helpful for me to benchmark products."
"The software quality gate streamlines the product's quality."
"The most valuable features are that it is user-friendly, easy to access, and they provide good training files."
"The most valuable feature is the security hotspot feature that identifies where your code is prone to have security issues."
"The reporting and the results are quick. It gets integrated within the pipeline well."
"This solution is simple to use and can be quickly deployed."
"I like that it covers most programming languages for source code review."
"I would like the tool to integrate AI and automation that is dedicated to detecting software vulnerabilities."
"SonarQube's detail in the security could be improved. It may be helpful to have additional details, with regards to Oracle PL/SQL. For example, it's neither as built nor as thorough as Java. For now, this is the only additional feature I would like to see."
"The handling of the contents of Docker container images could be better."
"From a reporting perspective, we sometimes have problems interpreting the vulnerability scan reports. For example, if it finds a possible threat, our analysts have to manually check the provided reports, and sometimes we have issues getting all the data needed to properly verify if it's accurate or not."
"The reporting can be improved."
"SonarQube needs to improve its ease of use, integration with third-party platforms, and scalability."
"There is need for support for the additional languages and ease of use in adding new rules for detecting issues."
"There needs to be a shareable reporting piece or something we can click and generate easily."
"I would also like SonarQube to be able to write custom scanning rules. More documentation would be helpful as well because some of our guys were struggling with the customization script."
Digital.ai Application Security is ranked 36th in Application Security Tools with 1 review while SonarQube is ranked 1st in Application Security Tools with 110 reviews. Digital.ai Application Security is rated 6.0, while SonarQube is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Digital.ai Application Security writes "Helps to improve knowledge on software security ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SonarQube writes "Easy to integrate and has a plug-in that supports both C and C++ languages". Digital.ai Application Security is most compared with PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and Fortify Application Defender, whereas SonarQube is most compared with Checkmarx One, SonarCloud, Coverity, Veracode and Snyk.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.