We performed a comparison between Elastic Security and Rapid7 InsightOps based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The stability of the solution is good."
"Elastic Security is very customizable, and the dashboards are very easy to build."
"The performance is good and it is faster than IBM QRadar."
"What customers found most valuable in Elastic Security feature-wise is the search capability, in particular, the way of writing the search query and the speed of searching for results."
"The most valuable features are the speed, detail, and visualization. It has the latest standards."
"The product has huge integration varieties available."
"The solution is quite stable. The performance has been good."
"The most valuable feature for me is Discover."
"It has the ability to alert and track logs from different sources."
"We can save logs as plain text."
"The ability to browse logs from multiple sources at the same time really speeds up root cause analysis."
"The most valuable feature of Rapid7 InsightOps is the search functionality."
"Integration of InsightOps with other tools, especially SIEM solutions, has generally improved operational efficiency."
"The biggest challenge has been related to the implementation."
"The interface could be more user friendly because it is sometimes hard to deal with."
"This type of monitoring is not very mature just yet. We need more real-time information in a way that's easier to manage."
"With Elastic Security, the challenge arises from the fact that there is a learning curve in relation to queries and understanding the query language provided to extract usable data."
"Sometimes, the solution isn't the easiest to use."
"The tool needs to integrate with legacy servers. Big companies can have legacy servers that may not always be updated."
"Their visuals and graphs need to be better."
"It could use maybe a little more on the Linux side."
"Rapid7 InsightOps could improve by making the search query better. There are times when the search query is broken and it does not find anything."
"The solution takes a little bit of time when we load the website for the first time."
"Since I used the beta, improvements are to be expected. The dashboard options could have been clearer, but I believe it is more a problem with the limited documentation available at the time."
"There are a few things I would like to do with a few more complex queries which I am not able to do right now, because it is a SaaS solution."
"Improvement is needed in the dashboard of InsightOps, especially for less technical users."
Elastic Security is ranked 5th in Log Management with 59 reviews while Rapid7 InsightOps is ranked 36th in Log Management with 9 reviews. Elastic Security is rated 7.6, while Rapid7 InsightOps is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Elastic Security writes "A stable and scalable tool that provides visibility along with the consolidation of logs to its users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rapid7 InsightOps writes "Useful search functionality, easy to use, and reliable". Elastic Security is most compared with Wazuh, Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, IBM Security QRadar and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, whereas Rapid7 InsightOps is most compared with Wazuh, Datadog, New Relic, Dynatrace and Splunk Enterprise Security. See our Elastic Security vs. Rapid7 InsightOps report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
