We performed a comparison between Enterasys Campus LAN Switches and HPE ProCurve based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two LAN Switching solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The performance is good."
"Enterasys Campus LAN Switches is a trustable and powerful solution. The solution has good web management features. You can do whatever you want, like a CLI. The solution is easy to diagnose and manage. I like the Linux-based operating system. If any service crashes, you need to restart the system."
"Extreme Networks is the only one that has this kind of universal switch. It simplifies things greatly. Customers no longer have to worry about the price differences between traditional and fabric technology switches, which used to have their own pricing. This has made it easier for us as solution providers to tailor options for our customers with fewer but more suitable choices."
"The solution is fast and inexpensive."
"The network management solutions that they have is great."
"The user interface is the most valuable aspect of the solution for us."
"The web page interface is very convenient and easy to use for setting up your feedback loops."
"The LAN features give us exactly what we need."
"It has a lifetime warranty, that includes lifetime updates."
"The most valuable feature of HPE ProCurve is its ease of use and implementation."
"The most valuable features are the price and the warranty."
"While the support is good, it could be better, and the price could be reduced."
"The tool's price is high. We need a cost-effective service. It also needs to add wireless controller features like Huawei."
"Security features do exist, and they're mostly common with other switches. What makes these switches unique is the ability to see application layers on the switch, but not directly through the switch. There are tools from Extreme Networks that allow visibility of such traffic, which other switches lack. Extreme CloudIQ analytics can analyze all the traffic on Extreme Switches up to layer seven, offering full visibility. However, this tool is necessary for such detailed analytics and might not be compatible with some third-party products."
"The solution doesn't have web-based management, which is why we've moved to a different solution."
"There is one proprietary function they lack, and I can't remember what it was called, but it monitors the ports, and then every 10 seconds if the port is down, it can divert the traffic somewhere else."
"The user interface (UI) could be better."
"The CLI is a bit confusing. It is not the easiest to manage, especially if you come from a Cisco environment."
"The solution's pricing could be made cheaper."
"Our customers are focused on features and generally, they would like to have a more feature-rich solution."
"There should be faster interfaces on the switch, such as 25 gigabits."
"Since we transfer from one gigabit to ten gigabits of information, in a future release, it would benefit to have more high-speed ports."
More Enterasys Campus LAN Switches Pricing and Cost Advice →
Enterasys Campus LAN Switches is ranked 11th in LAN Switching with 3 reviews while HPE ProCurve is ranked 2nd in LAN Switching with 37 reviews. Enterasys Campus LAN Switches is rated 8.6, while HPE ProCurve is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Enterasys Campus LAN Switches writes "A powerful solution with good web management features ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE ProCurve writes "Offers reliability and helps with vulnerability assessment". Enterasys Campus LAN Switches is most compared with , whereas HPE ProCurve is most compared with Cisco Catalyst Switches, Aruba Instant On Switches, NETGEAR Switches, Dell PowerConnect Switches and Cisco Nexus. See our Enterasys Campus LAN Switches vs. HPE ProCurve report.
See our list of best LAN Switching vendors.
We monitor all LAN Switching reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.