We performed a comparison between Evolven and Splunk Enterprise Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, New Relic, Devo and others in IT Operations Analytics."It facilitates infrastructure readiness and consistency."
"It provides visualization of risk levels."
"It is very scalable."
"The ability to analyze huge amounts of sales data and accurate prediction of sales forecasting is the most valuable feature."
"The solution is very fast and succinct."
"Good for log collection and log management."
"Splunk has a wide range of features that customers use to find and analyze all kinds of logs."
"It has quite extensive support in terms of integration. If you want to do anything, there are tools for that."
"Splunk Enterprise Security offers valuable features like seamless integration and a SQL-standard Structured Query Language for easy searching."
"Correlating data across different systems via one interface will allow you to know your environment or identify incident data in ways you never imagined."
"Alerting needs improvement."
"There are limitations with Splunk not detecting all user activity, especially on mainframes and network devices."
"Splunk ES could have more pre-built integrations and rules. The detection is fairly accurate, but it depends on the rules you create. Splunk's out-of-the-box configuration isn't that useful."
"The initial setup is complex, but this is necessary. We needed to take into consideration how to direct log files from thousands of machines to Splunk, and how to ingest those files."
"The Web Application Firewall will send you too much information because it's more dedicated to security than a normal firewall."
"The product could be cheaper."
"Integrating tools and creating use cases could be easier. It's hard for a junior security engineer with only a couple of years of experience to write use cases. They can do it, but it's much easier in a solution like IBM QRadar. Setting conditions is like a multiple-choice type of thing. It's a more user-friendly process."
"One issue is that we are getting a lot of false positives. We are trying to reduce them by customizing the default rules, changing thresholds, and using white-listing and black-listing. It's getting better and better as a result. But they need to build components that would reduce the false positives."
"The training was mostly sales-focused, like how to monitor your sales. It was hard to then come back from doing the training and try to switch it to a cybersecurity focus because all the training we did was sales oriented. The basic training didn't really touch on any kind of cybersecurity use cases or anything like that. That would have been great to see in the training."
Earn 20 points
Evolven is ranked 17th in IT Operations Analytics while Splunk Enterprise Security is ranked 1st in IT Operations Analytics with 240 reviews. Evolven is rated 7.0, while Splunk Enterprise Security is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Evolven writes "Provides visualization of risk levels. However, alerting needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk Enterprise Security writes "It has a drag-and-drop interface, so you don't need to know SQL or Java to construct a query ". Evolven is most compared with , whereas Splunk Enterprise Security is most compared with Wazuh, Dynatrace, IBM Security QRadar, Elastic Security and Microsoft Sentinel.
See our list of best IT Operations Analytics vendors.
We monitor all IT Operations Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.