We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiSandbox and ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, ESET and others in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)."The most valuable feature is the protection and the way it works, the technology is what I like the most."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"Integration is one of the solution's most valuable aspects. You can integrate even third-party solutions so that they can send the information or files they quarantine through the FortiSandbox"
"The most valuable feature was the EDR, endpoint detection and response."
"Fortinet FortiSandbox puts suspicious files in quarantine, analyzes for virus risks, and lets them out of quarantine if it detects no risk."
"The most valuable features of Fortinet FortiSandbox are the analysis options, artificial intelligence, and the many interfaces it provides."
"The GUI makes administration tasks straightforward."
"Performance is a valuable feature."
"The most valuable features are ease of use and the ability to customize it."
"The product automatically generated a threat score based on the maliciousness of an IP."
"ThreatConnect has a highly user-friendly interface."
"It's a solid platform and is stable enough. It is not complicated and is easy to use."
More ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) Pros →
"The licensing can be very confusing. It needs to be simplified."
"If we can have more dashboards, it would be good."
"The initial setup is not too complex but could be easier."
"In future releases, I would like to see more automation capabilities."
"In general, maybe they are not updated to cover risks."
"Something that needs to improve, is the end-point protection."
"It can be difficult if you need to use the Command Line Interface (CLI). It's much easier if you only have to deal with the GUI."
"Most people are confused about how to use the right integration of the right Fortinet product."
"They should make it a little bit easier to generate events and share them with the community"
"Integration is an area that could use some improvement."
"I couldn’t get any training videos online when I was working with the tool."
"It would be good to have more feeds and more integrated sources for enrichment."
More ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) Cons →
More ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Fortinet FortiSandbox is ranked 5th in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 36 reviews while ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) is ranked 4th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 4 reviews. Fortinet FortiSandbox is rated 8.2, while ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiSandbox writes "Light and powerful solution design; useful to have". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) writes "The tool could be integrated into any environment, but it was expensive, and the deployment process was complex". Fortinet FortiSandbox is most compared with Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Trellix Network Detection and Response, Check Point SandBlast Network, Microsoft Defender for Office 365 and Fortinet FortiEDR, whereas ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) is most compared with Anomali ThreatStream, Recorded Future, ThreatQ, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR and Anomali Match.
We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
