We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiWeb and KerioControl based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."It is a stable product."
"SSL Offloading simplifies the public certificate handling and brings additional protection features."
"It is a good product. We have just blocked everything coming from some geographical locations or certain countries, and it has been working very efficiently when I look at logs, events, and incidents generated from the system. It is generating very good analytic reports about it. This is the most valuable thing about this solution. It has load balancing and almost everything that a web application firewall needs. It is very flexible and easy to learn and configure. It can be easily learned and configured by using the information available on different channels such as YouTube."
"It's the extra security that is the most valuable feature. You have insight into your traffic. There are some great insights into what utilities hackers are trying to exploit. It blocks a lot of stuff from the internet."
"The reason I recommend this product is because it guarantees that your network will be safe if it is set up properly and you fully utilize most of the functions."
"The GUI is user-friendly and it's easy to understand how to manage it."
"The GUI is user-friendly."
"Both the internal firewall management and the cloud can be managed by a single console."
"The solution’s firewall and intrusion detection features are quite good because you can see exactly who is attacking you and who is getting blocked."
"The flexibility of the system, the capacity to provide the right level of security, and the ability to be integrated into different kinds of infrastructures are the most valuable features."
"The most valuable features of Kerio Control are the IPS and traffic rules. The traffic rules are very user-friendly and the IPS is working well. Additionally, the anti-virus is effective with quick options, such as filtering."
"The user interface and the ease of use are pretty good. Everything fits together so nicely."
"The installation is straightforward."
"The solution is user-friendly."
"The solution provides feasibility regarding cyber privacy."
"Kerio has improved my organization's security."
"The solution could improve by providing more integration with solutions other than the Fortinet family."
"FortiWeb needs to have support for the newest technology being used in web applications."
"The Layer 7 DDoS attacks need improvement, it could be better."
"We would like the interface to be easier to use and more user-friendly. The interface needs to be enhanced."
"The solution could have more customization."
"If the price was lower, it would be a bit more attractive, as an option, to the customers."
"They can introduce a scaled-down version for the SMB market. It would be very competitive in the environment."
"Sometimes, even if you follow the documentation, it doesn't work as expected."
"I have had a few issues with HTTPS decryption. The solution also does not show the actual user's Internet usage."
"They should improve the remote connectivity feature for users."
"If I would suggest anything, it would be to expand on its multifactor authentication to be a little bit more user-friendly. They should do multifactor authentications for the client itself perhaps, rather than served on a webpage, in a page hijack, that might be more user-friendly, but I don't have a lot of complaints about it. It's doing its job. You have to have a certain amount of skills to configure these things anyway, the ones that we use on-site doing point-to-point, and we've been tricked up a few times with their interfaces."
"The overall speed needs improvement. Internet connectivity speed needs to be improved somehow."
"I would like it if the interface section had multiple failovers. Although I do have three connections, just in case our physical cables get disconnected, I can only set up one failover as a backup. So, if for some reason our fiber and our AFM went down together, I would have to have it search for our 4G modem. I'd love to have extra backups running."
"KerioControl should add more options in VPN features, such as IPsec VPNs, SSL VPNs, and L2TP VPNs, because KerioControl uses a special VPN for their products."
"They should add wireless features."
"I find it a bit costly to pay for the products that I am not using. They need to change their model in such a way that you don't have to pay for the products that you are not using. Its local support and scalability are also not good. I am looking forward to a more scalable product that will be able to grow with time and technology."
Fortinet FortiWeb is ranked 4th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 83 reviews while KerioControl is ranked 29th in Firewalls with 54 reviews. Fortinet FortiWeb is rated 8.0, while KerioControl is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiWeb writes "Cost-effective, easy to configure, and works very well as a single solution for multiple environments". On the other hand, the top reviewer of KerioControl writes "With VPN, any of our guys can log in to the system and effectively be on board; helps with our customers all over the world". Fortinet FortiWeb is most compared with F5 Advanced WAF, Fortinet FortiADC, AWS WAF, Azure Web Application Firewall and Imperva Web Application Firewall, whereas KerioControl is most compared with Netgate pfSense, Fortinet FortiGate, OPNsense, Sophos UTM and Sophos XG.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.