We performed a comparison between GajShield Next Generation Firewall and Sophos Cyberoam UTM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Firewalls solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The interface is very good."
"The VPN is the most valuable feature."
"We've found the solution to be pretty stable."
"From the firewall perspective, the rules and policies are very sufficient and easy to use."
"This solution has helped our organization by having strong functions and a reliable firewall."
"It's super reliable. I don't think I've ever had a reliability issue with it."
"Provides good firewall security and has great VPN features."
"The most valuable feature of Fortinet FortiGate is URL filtering."
"Gajshiled's enterprise cloud and DLP-level features give it an advantage over other products."
"It is an easily scalable solution...The initial setup was very easy."
"It is a stable solution."
"GajShield Next Generation Firewall's best feature is the network DLP."
"The most valuable feature of the GajShield Next Generation Firewall is the user-friendly settings, dashboards, and anti-threat protection. Additionally, the solution upgrades frequently which is good because we receive new features."
"The solution's outcome is very high, and we often use it in a very high-traffic environment."
"GajShield has improved our mobile device-based connectivity."
"It is very easy to use."
"There are plenty of features that are valuable in the Sophos Cyberoam UTM. We use all the features, such as email Security, firewall rules, web server security, web devices, web protection."
"The product is worth the investment."
"The firewall feature has different branches, such as extended firewalls."
"The performance has been good overall."
"The solution is easy to integrate."
"The most valuable feature is the solution is easy to configure for users."
"It has been working fine. You just turn it on, and it works."
"The initial setup and configuration are not intuitive and require training."
"For the migration, everyone has a firewall in use and I am selling Fortinet. Typically, I am replacing another firewall. Previously, there was a tool available to convert configurations from one firewall, such as Palo Alto, to Fortinet, but this tool is no longer free. If it could be made free again, it would be very beneficial."
"I would like to see improvements in the support from Fortinet. Here in the Philippines, whenever we have problems with a Fortinet product, we mostly ask for support from distributors and resellers and not directly from Fortinet."
"MTBF: Hardware failure is more common when compared to SonicWall or Cisco ASA."
"Lacks sufficient security options."
"A lack of integration between our data centers."
"One area for improvement is the performance on the bandwidth demands for smaller devices, as well as better web filtering."
"Compared to some other products, the DLP is not at par for the moment."
"The firewall configuration and administration screens could use some improvement."
"Gajshield can improve SD-WAN compatibility at an enterprise cloud level."
"GajShield Next Generation Firewall could improve the flow of the settings. If somebody's using a Cisco firewall or any other brand and they want to use GajShield Next Generation Firewall the platform's UI is a bit different. If it was more similar to the others it would be better."
"We face issues with some configuration parts that we don't understand in the solution, and sometimes we face issues with the VPN connection."
"We raised a support ticket, and the project didn't get a proper response. There was a skill issue in TAC support."
"GajShield Next Generation Firewall would be improved with the addition of a load-balancing feature."
"Sometimes, we have to use SD-WAN support for the solution, which can be improved by adapting some features that will help our approach to network services."
"The implementation policy needs improvment."
"The product had a hang issue. We needed to reboot, recreate the image, and reconfigure the previous image because the product hanged frequently."
"I would like to see improvements in the development of reports. The process needs to be made simple."
"The solution could be cheaper."
"The solution had a feature to import users from a CSV file. However, the latest version does not have that option."
"The VPN needs to be improved."
"The setup is a bit complex, so we needed help from a consultant."
"The technical support response time could be faster."
More GajShield Next Generation Firewall Pricing and Cost Advice →
GajShield Next Generation Firewall is ranked 30th in Firewalls with 7 reviews while Sophos Cyberoam UTM is ranked 7th in Unified Threat Management (UTM) with 81 reviews. GajShield Next Generation Firewall is rated 7.8, while Sophos Cyberoam UTM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of GajShield Next Generation Firewall writes "User-friendly settings, frequent updates, and responsive support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sophos Cyberoam UTM writes "Stable and has a straightforward setup; reporting is fast and easy". GajShield Next Generation Firewall is most compared with Sophos XG, WiJungle and Netgate pfSense, whereas Sophos Cyberoam UTM is most compared with Cisco Secure Firewall, Netgate pfSense, Sophos UTM, Juniper SRX Series Firewall and Sophos XG. See our GajShield Next Generation Firewall vs. Sophos Cyberoam UTM report.
See our list of best Firewalls vendors.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.