We performed a comparison between Galvanize HighBond and RSA Archer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two GRC solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is automation."
"This solution helped us with the centralization of our governance data, so we could house all of our controls in one place. We could use that central repository of all our controls to build our risk management strategy and our policy and governance. So we could use controls as a central library and build policy, and then build risk management around it."
"I like how Archer requires very little programming ability. A person with minimum coding experience can configure the necessary fields in Archer. It's more of a drag-and-drop solution."
"RSA Archer's best features are advanced workflow, reports, dashboards, and notifications."
"The last project was for an investment group that was using Excel. Shifting their records from one position to another took approximately 15 minutes. In Archer, we created a workflow for them to leverage it, and they could send the single record with one click to one person within seconds. The whole process went from 15 minutes to two minutes to get the approval for the records. The main purpose of Archer is to just make it easy."
"Makes auditing much more convenient."
"The solution has improved my organization by having everything combined to a single platform."
"One of the useful features is the ability to connect to various systems in order to accommodate data."
"The solution has helped our organization manage our internal and external activities."
"The cost of the solution is expensive and needs improvement."
"The first improvement I would suggest for RSA Archer is a better search feature. The search criteria needs to be improved. Sometimes I do a search and the search doesn't return the exact item I'm looking for. RSA Archer could also be improved by being more user-friendly. Maybe I have been using a limited version of RSA Archer, but I'm not sure whether it has ESG, environmental and social governance. In the next couple of years, ESG is the next feature that will be integrated into GRC tools. I would recommend RSA Archer adds ESG."
"The solution can be a little slow due to the Silverlight feature."
"In terms of what can be improved, our client always says their user experience, IU/UX in RSA Archer. They found it is not as user friendly as other tools."
"RSA Archer's best features are advanced workflow, reports, dashboards, and notifications."
"Recently, we made a suggestion for cross references, like for one application to another. There were limitations there, so we're hoping that will be included in the next upgrade."
"I would like to have the ability to build and maintain an inventory of personal data processing activities and assets utilizing a purpose-built taxonomy and data structure."
"Performance could be improved."
"RSA Archer might be a bit expensive for small companies because it's a vast tool."
Galvanize HighBond is ranked 9th in GRC with 3 reviews while RSA Archer is ranked 1st in GRC with 38 reviews. Galvanize HighBond is rated 8.6, while RSA Archer is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Galvanize HighBond writes "Good automation and analytics, but is costly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA Archer writes "A rich application with good workflow, but search feature needs improvement". Galvanize HighBond is most compared with ACL Analytics and Workiva Wdesk, whereas RSA Archer is most compared with OneTrust GRC, IBM OpenPages, MetricStream, Microsoft Purview Communication Compliance and Workiva Wdesk. See our Galvanize HighBond vs. RSA Archer report.
See our list of best GRC vendors, best IT Governance vendors, and best IT Vendor Risk Management vendors.
We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.