We performed a comparison between GitHub CoPilot and GitLab based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."GitHub CoPilot has good stability and performance."
"The most valuable aspects in terms of features, revolve around its code generation capabilities."
"The product's most valuable feature is vulnerability management features."
"The product is easy to integrate."
"The document generation features are valuable."
"The initial setup of the product is easy."
"GitHub CoPilot accelerates productivity. It is an easy-to-use solution that is also helpful in saving the team's time."
"When I write code, I feel like I have someone sitting with me to help me. Wherever I'm stuck, I just ask a question, and it provides guidance that I can use."
"We have seen a couple of merge requests or pull requests raised in GitLab. I see the interface, the way it shows the difference between the two source codes, that it is easy for anyone to do the review and then accept the request; the pull request is the valuable feature."
"We like that we can have an all-encompassing product and don't have to implement different solutions."
"Git hosting has an integration with ACD which is why we liked this solution in the first place."
"GitLab is kind of an image of GitHub, so it gives us the flexibility to monitor our changes in the repos."
"Of all available products, it was the easiest to use and easy to install."
"The solution has an established roadmap that lays out its plans for upgrades over the next two to three years."
"The user interface is really good so that helps with huge teams who need to collaborate."
"The most valuable feature of GitLab is its security."
"GitHub CoPilot’s integration with other solutions could be improved."
"GitHub CoPilot's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"Some of the suggestions provided by GitHub CoPilot are not accurate, making it an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The suggestions provided by the product must be improved."
"The solution is expensive. It should also support other programming languages."
"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"GitHub CoPilot's alerting features need improvement."
"There's room for improvement to ensure that suggestions align more precisely with the context of what I'm seeking, minimizing instances of unrelated or inaccurate code suggestions."
"I'm new to GitLab, so I would appreciate more documentation about the code and commands."
"Some of the scripts that we encountered in GitLab were not fully functional and threw up errors."
"Based on what I know so far, its integration with Kubernetes is not so good. We have to develop many things to make it work. We have to acquire third-party components to work with Kubernetes."
"GitLab's Windows version is yet not available and having this would be an improvement."
"We do face issues in our company when we run out of disk space."
"We are having a few problems integrating with Jira at the moment, which is something that our IT department is investigating."
"Their RBAC is role-based access, which is fine but not very good."
"Merge conflicts and repository maintenance could improve. If there is someone new to the system they would not know if there is a conflict."
GitHub CoPilot is ranked 15th in Rapid Application Development Software with 10 reviews while GitLab is ranked 10th in Rapid Application Development Software with 70 reviews. GitHub CoPilot is rated 8.4, while GitLab is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of GitHub CoPilot writes "Though it offers good integration features, the price needs to be lowered". On the other hand, the top reviewer of GitLab writes "Powerful, mature, and easy to set up and manage". GitHub CoPilot is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Pega BPM, ServiceNow, Mendix and OutSystems, whereas GitLab is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Bamboo, SonarQube, AWS CodePipeline and Veracode. See our GitHub CoPilot vs. GitLab report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.