We performed a comparison between GitLab and Inedo BuildMaster based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Build Automation."We like that we can create branches and then the branches can be reviewed and you can mesh those branches back. You can independently work with your own branch, you don't need to really control the core of other people."
"The merging feature makes it easy later on for the deployment."
"I like that it's easy to deploy our services over GitLab. The customer support is also good with a really active community. You have a lot of support that you can get online with your stack. That is probably one of the benefits of using GitLab. It's also really fast."
"It scales well."
"We're only using the basic features of GitLab and haven't used any advanced features. The solution works fine, so that's what we like about GitLab. We're party using GitHub and GitLab. We have a GitHub server, while we use GitLab locally or only within our team, and it works okay. We don't have any significant problems with the solution. We also found the straightforward setup, stability, and scalability of GitLab valuable."
"The most valuable feature of GitLab is its security."
"The most valuable features of Gitlab are integration with CIE and the ability to rapidly deploy solutions, projects, and applications. It is very easy to use, and there are no complaints."
"The important feature is the entire process of versioning source code maintenance and easy deployment. It is a necessity for the CI/CD pipeline."
"Technical support is quick to respond. I haven't had any issues with them."
"Reporting could be improved."
"GitLab's UI could be improved."
"GitLab can improve the integration with third-party applications. It could be made easier. Additionally, having API control from my application could be helpful."
"It is a little complex to set up the pipelines within the solution."
"We would like to generate document pages from the sources."
"There is room for improvement in GitLab Agents."
"It can be free for commercial use."
"I would like configuration of a YML file to be done via UI rather than a code file."
"The documentation should be better. It should be very easy to call REST APIs, and the documentation has to be perfect for that."
GitLab is ranked 1st in Build Automation with 70 reviews while Inedo BuildMaster is ranked 21st in Build Automation with 1 review. GitLab is rated 8.6, while Inedo BuildMaster is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of GitLab writes "Powerful, mature, and easy to set up and manage". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Inedo BuildMaster writes "Deployment agent that allows us to deploy out to various other servers but doesn't provide build automation". GitLab is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Bamboo, SonarQube, AWS CodePipeline and Tekton, whereas Inedo BuildMaster is most compared with .
See our list of best Build Automation vendors.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.