We performed a comparison between GitLab and ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Agile Planning Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution's service delivery model is fantastic."
"The best thing is that as the developers work on separate tasks, all of the code goes there and the other team members don't have to wait on each other to finish."
"As a developer, this solution is useful as a repository holder because most of the POC projects that we have are on GitLab."
"I have found the most valuable features of GitLab are the GitClone, GitPush, GitPull, GitMatch, GitMit, GitCommit, and GitStatus."
"The dashboard and interface make it easy to use."
"The stability is good."
"It is very flexible and easy because you can store data on cloud."
"We have seen a couple of merge requests or pull requests raised in GitLab. I see the interface, the way it shows the difference between the two source codes, that it is easy for anyone to do the review and then accept the request; the pull request is the valuable feature."
"The demand management tool is very strategic because it helps assess risk, gives you a visual of different demands, and rates those values."
"The feature I find the most valuable is the one that lets you see how much time has been used in processing a ticket. This allows us to better monitor performance."
"The interface is user-friendly. It's one of the most user-friendly on the market, and the most complete."
"ServiceNow brings to the market different layers with different pricing, so you can customize. And all the layers are really enterprise-ready."
"The interface is extremely user-friendly."
"The solution is scalable."
"The program is stable."
"The solution was quite easy to use. The interface was quite user-friendly, and I've become quite familiar with it."
"In the free version, when a merge request is raised, there is no way to enforce certain rules. We can't enforce that this merge request must be reviewed or approved by two or three people in the team before it is pushed to the master branch. That's why we are exploring using some agents."
"GitLab could consider introducing a code-scanning tool. Purchasing such tools from external markets can incur charges, which might not be favorable. Integrating these features into GitLab would streamline the pipeline and make it more convenient for users."
"The integration could be slightly better."
"This solution could be improved by adding modifications such as slack notifications."
"It can be free for commercial use."
"I would like to see better integration with project management tools such as Jira."
"Expand features to match other tools such as a static code analysis tool so third-party integrations are not required."
"GitLab can improve by integrating with more tools, such as servers with Docker."
"I would like to see some artificial intelligence incorporated into the management functions."
"The solution needs a few things in terms of resource management."
"The price keeps going up, and to remain competitive, it needs to have a competitive edge. I would like to see more of the latest innovations, in terms of AI, ML, and all of the latest cutting-edge technologies, included in the platform."
"When we import a really big project with a lot of tasks on it, we face some issues with dependencies. The links between tasks are not working very well. There is definitely room for improvement there. Microsoft Project, in my opinion, is the best option for such a use case."
"The interface is cluttered with a lot of names and areas. It may not be user friendly enough for a first timer."
"The interface isn't user-friendly."
"The cost could be improved. The solution is quite pricey."
"ServiceNow needs to invest more in integration. That's the only thing. It could always extend its portfolio a little bit."
More ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
GitLab is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools with 70 reviews while ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is ranked 5th in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools with 27 reviews. GitLab is rated 8.6, while ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of GitLab writes "Powerful, mature, and easy to set up and manage". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management writes "A very strategic demand management tool that visualizes risks and ratings in a bubble chart". GitLab is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, SonarQube, Bamboo, AWS CodePipeline and Tekton, whereas ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira, Jira Align and Microsoft Project Server. See our GitLab vs. ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management report.
See our list of best Enterprise Agile Planning Tools vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Agile Planning Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.