We performed a comparison between HPE ProLiant DL Servers and Huawei FusionServer RH Series Rack Servers based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Lenovo and others in Rack Servers."The most valuable feature of the solution is scalability."
"There is a lot of extra storage. I am only using half of what I need."
"The initial setup for HPE ProLiant DL Servers is easy."
"It's easy to upgrade, and it is very easy to take care of the firmware upgrades."
"We have had our system working for between two and three years with no downtime."
"The most valuable features of HPE ProLiant DL Servers are very high quality."
"HPE ProLiant DL Servers have good performance and they support different types of applications."
"What I like most about HPE ProLiant DL Servers is that it gives the support and hardware availability that my company requires."
"The most valuable thing about Huawei FusionServer is the fact that it's easy to use."
"They should build risc processors with high speed."
"The cost of the solution is high and has room for improvement."
"The initial configuration process could be simpler."
"They can increase the controller cache. Currently, it has a controller cache of up to 4 GB. The RAID controller card comes with a maximum of 4 GB cache in HPE servers, whereas it comes with a maximum of 8 GB cache in Dell servers. They can also improve the port size. HP provides a 25 GB port on the server, whereas both Dell and Cisco provide a 100 GB port."
"The overall cost of the product needs to be lower, as it is one of the areas of concern in the product."
"The technical support is pretty good, however, they could be a bit faster and more responsive."
"The solution could improve by providing more best practices from an architectural point of view. What are some recommended configurations for use, such as in a VM environment? HP provides some best practices but they are based on VMware, not on Red Hat. It would benefit for others to see the different use cases. How the HPE ProLiant DL Servers were used in the context of Red hat virtualization, and some configurations as an example to allow us to identify some points that we can improve in our platform. We could make our system more reliable and scalable."
"They are pretty solid servers, but, just like all servers, they become obsolete after some time. They can maybe provide a console to monitor the health of the servers. There should be some kind of console to which you can log in to remotely check on the health of a server, even when the server is off. The servers that we have are only scalable to some extent. They have got a limited amount of hard drive that you can insert. Their scalability should be improved."
"In the next release, I'd like to see more features not in the hardware but in the platform where I can manage all the servers and the hardware of the servers."
HPE ProLiant DL Servers is ranked 2nd in Rack Servers with 156 reviews while Huawei FusionServer RH Series Rack Servers is ranked 11th in Rack Servers with 1 review. HPE ProLiant DL Servers is rated 8.6, while Huawei FusionServer RH Series Rack Servers is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of HPE ProLiant DL Servers writes "Good availability and management console with good reliability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Huawei FusionServer RH Series Rack Servers writes "Simple to use and compatible with all other operating systems". HPE ProLiant DL Servers is most compared with Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers, Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers, HPE Apollo, Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers and Oracle SPARC Servers, whereas Huawei FusionServer RH Series Rack Servers is most compared with Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers and Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers.
See our list of best Rack Servers vendors.
We monitor all Rack Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
