We performed a comparison between IBM BPM and Microsoft .NET Framework based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Infrastructure solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Compliance with the BPMN 2.0 standard."
"The reach with Integration Adapters and support for adding custom Java code are valuable features."
"They have some quick-win programs that are designed to come in, they'll bring a developer in and they'll work with your developer to get you started. That's what we did and that worked really great. We got an understanding of the product, we got an understanding of how to deploy the product. And when we were done with that engagement, we were off and running."
"It makes the company business processes work more efficiently."
"Agility is the key. It gives our customers a faster way to be able to implement processes, get ownership of task, visibility into a process. The ability to modify that process, optimize that process over time, is probably the biggest benefit that they get from the software."
"Integration is a big plus for me."
"IBM BPM is easy to deploy."
"It provides value and simplifies processes."
"When it comes to the user interface, the context is better than other tools because it is easier to use."
"Initial setup is straightforward. All the components are readily available."
"The .NET framework is a mature platform that is very helpful and saves time during the software development process."
"If we take low code, no code platform such as RPA platforms, you might end up writing 100 lines of code and you might do it in a single line of code using. NET."
"The technology is very scalable and accessible to use."
"It facilitated the streamlined scheduling process by amalgamating inputs from various sources, including location data and other systems."
"The product has a good interface and easy-to-use programming language."
"Microsoft .NET Framework reduces the cost of entry and enables the development of applications with mature and enterprise features, thereby lowering the entry barriers."
"If the processing gets better, it would be more efficient."
"Better integration with other products in the automation suite."
"The solution can improve integration with SAP, CRM, and Salesforce, which is not capital-intensive."
"The constant switch between Eclipse and its web versions can be annoying and confusing."
"IBM BPM can improve the dashboards and reports. It only has two dashboards, and reporting is very difficult to build."
"If you want to use IBM BPM, you will have to invest a lot of money for licenses and you need to learn that there are limitations in developing applications. You cannot create anything you want."
"There needs to be better documentation for IBM BPM in a central place. There is not any standard documentation for each component available and has been a barrier for developers."
"Integration with web services, especially in the standard version of the product."
"There are performance constraints when multiple users are accessing the application and that consumes CPU resources."
"The .NET open source community could be larger."
"In my opinion, this solution can be improved by providing out-of-the-box support for different types of libraries."
"The cloud features must be improved."
"Lacking in auto-scaling."
"You need to have the technical expertise to use this product."
"The product's price is an area of concern, making it an area where improvements are required."
"The product could have a better framework for application development."
IBM BPM is ranked 7th in Application Infrastructure with 105 reviews while Microsoft .NET Framework is ranked 4th in Application Infrastructure with 47 reviews. IBM BPM is rated 7.8, while Microsoft .NET Framework is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of IBM BPM writes "Offers good case management and its integration with process design but there's a learning curve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft .NET Framework writes "Intuitive, easier to develop, maintain, and migrate from the old framework to newer versions". IBM BPM is most compared with Camunda, Appian, Pega BPM, IBM Business Automation Workflow and Apache Airflow, whereas Microsoft .NET Framework is most compared with IIS, Magic xpa Application Platform, JBoss Enterprise Application Platform, Apache Web Server and SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal. See our IBM BPM vs. Microsoft .NET Framework report.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.