We performed a comparison between IBM Integration Bus and Oracle Service Bus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It can be implemented as an enterprise service bus to seamlessly connect all applications within your enterprise."
"The biggest advantage of this solution is that it is very easy to learn, and very easy to build applications."
"The features I have found most valuable in this solution are transformation and routing."
"My favorite feature is the XML-based DFDL mapping, which is a tool that allows you to graphically map legacy data formats to modern data formats."
"The system's stability is the most valuable feature."
"One of the most valuable features is App Connect Enterprise makes it possible to deploy it in the OpenShift cluster, which is very good. Overall the solution is very flexible."
"IBM Integration Bus' most valuable features are its performance, fast and easy development, and easy support."
"Content is easily infiltrated in the eclipse infrastructure."
"I am a part of the software developing team and I mainly use this solution for the integrating applications."
"We've been pleased with the level of technical support."
"What I like most about Oracle Service Bus is that you can use it for many integrations. For example, you can use it for on-premises to on-premises integrations, on-premises to cloud integrations, and cloud to on-premises integrations."
"What I found most valuable in Oracle Service Bus is its time to market. It's excellent."
"Its ease of use is valuable. It's very easy to use. It's no code/low code. Oracle Middleware products are also rich in adapters."
"I like the ease of deployment and the ease of implementation."
"It is lightweight and one can easily integrate with different applications, databases, JMS, or web services through different protocols."
"The communication between applications is already defined, which means that you don't have to redefine your service infrastructure at the lower level."
"The interface could be more user-friendly."
"The version of the technology and current knowledge is a bit outdated."
"The product could be improved by including more resources on SQL."
"I don't mind the pricing."
"I would like to see more metered rest and API support. IBM is already working on it on Version 11, but it still needs improvement."
"The solution is complex and there is a need for more resources and greatly improved quality."
"It would be beneficial for it to function more as an iPaaS, with the runtime available in the cloud, potentially on platforms like AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud."
"In terms of improvement, the UI should be more user-friendly."
"This solution should work better with RESTful services."
"There are times when I select components in composite and they do not appear, and I cannot figure out why."
"The interface console is very slow. Even in production, we need to increase the RAM or CPU. And even after that, the performance is still not good in production."
"There are some loopholes in service and support."
"The inconvenient part about working with this product is that it's very heavy, requiring a lot of people and a lot of resources."
"There is significant room for improvement in the monitoring capabilities."
"It would be ideal if they could optimize it a bit."
"There are issues, especially if you want to create some compensation in your service bin."
IBM Integration Bus is ranked 1st in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 65 reviews while Oracle Service Bus is ranked 5th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 25 reviews. IBM Integration Bus is rated 8.0, while Oracle Service Bus is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of IBM Integration Bus writes "Scalable solution with efficient integration features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Service Bus writes "Enables us to do a lot of aggregation and routing, but API response can be a problem if the payload is heavy". IBM Integration Bus is most compared with Mule ESB, webMethods Integration Server, IBM WebSphere Message Broker, IBM DataPower Gateway and Red Hat Fuse, whereas Oracle Service Bus is most compared with Mule ESB, webMethods Integration Server, Red Hat Fuse, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus. See our IBM Integration Bus vs. Oracle Service Bus report.
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.