We performed a comparison between IBM Rational DOORS and Parasoft Development Testing Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Requirements Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We have different generations of all products. It lets us select and see unique attributes for each release or generation. You can use attributes to define a selection area to see which equipments are for the old versions and which ones are for the new versions. This inbuilt view is what I like in IBM Rational DOORS. So, for a database and a set of requirements, it will select and show unique attributes for a release or a generation."
"Makes good work of prioritizing and planning product delivery."
"I would say that the best feature of the solution is that since everything is in one place, and if you make any changes, then they are recorded or tracked."
"IBM Rational DOORS keeps everything organized."
"The most valuable feature is the management verification and login."
"Traceability on requirements for a huge project in an organization is a big gain."
"Compared to other tools that I have used over the past 20 years, DOORS is the best of the best."
"The program is very stable."
"The most valuable feature is code coverage."
"It really helps developers execute scenarios through DTP and share reports/results across the teams."
"The interface needs an area to be able to type your query and actually be able to find them."
"The kind of dashboard is not very convenient."
"IBM should integrate some solutions they already own toenhance the utility of the product further. Specifically import and export to Office products is more difficult than it needs to be."
"It would have been ok ten years ago, but we are used to having better tools now."
"It would be nice if it could be scaled-down so that it could be installed and implemented without much learning or training."
"It used to be very clunky."
"I would like to see them improve in agile management the Scrum/Kanban Board to work with overseas team members."
"I think there is probably room to improve by offering free training."
"The solution's speed has room for improvement."
"Parallel execution: It would help it multiple executions could be done at the same time."
IBM Rational DOORS is ranked 1st in Application Requirements Management with 51 reviews while Parasoft Development Testing Platform is ranked 9th in Application Requirements Management with 4 reviews. IBM Rational DOORS is rated 8.0, while Parasoft Development Testing Platform is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of IBM Rational DOORS writes " Offers ability to automate tasks and to track changes within documents and compare different versions of requirements but modeling capabilities could benefit from a web-based tool ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Parasoft Development Testing Platform writes "Provides 100 percent code coverage, is stable, and scalable". IBM Rational DOORS is most compared with Polarion Requirements, Jira, Jama Connect, Helix ALM and IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation, whereas Parasoft Development Testing Platform is most compared with Codebeamer. See our IBM Rational DOORS vs. Parasoft Development Testing Platform report.
See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.
We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.