We performed a comparison between IBM DevOps Test UI and Katalon Studio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Regression Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is compatible with all sorts of Dark Net applications. Its coverage is very good."
"Test automation is most valuable because it saves a lot of time."
"IBM Rational Functional Tester is very contextual."
"The most valuable feature is the UI component tester."
"Whenever I speak to the support team of Katalon Studio, I learn that some new features will be included in the product. It is a scalable product."
"One of the features that I like is Object Recognition. It worked very well, and it allowed me to create a dynamic expert based on my requirements."
"The best thing about the solution is that there is a record and playback functionality."
"It provides us daily feedback on the status (failing/working) of the core features of our websites."
"Katalon Studio's biggest advantage is its price. It's a good tool for the price, albeit with some limitations when you compare it with tools like Tricentis Tosca."
"The functionality of the data is very good. You can upload and disperse data using the solution."
"The recording feature of this product is very valuable for our testing purposes."
"It is a good tool and provides all the essential features for our business requirements."
"The latest version has increased load time before testing can be run."
"If the solution is running on Linux, there are some issues around application compatibility."
"They need to do a complete revamp so that even a non-technical person can manage the tool."
"As many of our products are moving from PC to mobile, the most important thing that this solution needs is mobile app support."
"I've seen that our clients are not truly aware of the power behind Katalon."
"The integration process with Jira should be enhanced and facilitated."
"The Object Spy is rather frustrating to work with, so I tend not to use it."
"Its stability needs improvement."
"The price of the solution is a bit high. It's one of the reasons we decided not to continue using the product."
"We have had some issues when it comes to stability, which is something that needs to be improved."
"Support options need improvement. It is sometimes hard to find a solution to any given problem, thus you are forced to use another solution."
"There is not much support offered for the free version, which is something that could be improved."
IBM DevOps Test UI is ranked 10th in Regression Testing Tools with 8 reviews while Katalon Studio is ranked 3rd in Regression Testing Tools with 42 reviews. IBM DevOps Test UI is rated 7.2, while Katalon Studio is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of IBM DevOps Test UI writes "Reliable test automation, and test data creation with efficient support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Katalon Studio writes "Useful multiple technology platform, scalable, but usability could improve". IBM DevOps Test UI is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Selenium HQ, HCL OneTest, Worksoft Certify and OpenText UFT One, whereas Katalon Studio is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Postman, OpenText UFT One, Testim and Appium. See our IBM DevOps Test UI vs. Katalon Studio report.
See our list of best Regression Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Regression Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.