We performed a comparison between Imperva DDoS and Radware DefensePro based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Incapsula takes care of the CDN infrastructure and bandwidth volume, providing several enterprise "load balancing" features."
"The solution is very good at intercepting traffic before it gets to our data centers."
"The most valuable features are DDoS protection."
"We have peace of mind that nobody will use malware on us or try to hack our website."
"On the site security, I can see which countries have incidents, whether it was a robot attack, a real human user, or non-human user."
"Simplifies putting everything in code."
"Imperva Incapsula has many valuable features. One, it protects the top 10 OWAS vulnerability, the open web application software platform, this is standard. Secondly, it protects against broken authentication. As well, it has remote execution of code."
"Technical support provides good, quick responses."
"It offers valuable insights into ongoing and past attacks, aiding in post-incident analysis and continuous improvement of our cybersecurity strategy."
"Technologically simple and effective."
"Its functionality is very good."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to create signatures on-demand."
"They have a hybrid model approach if a client wants to go that way."
"All of our traffic has to pass through the appliance, so we can very quickly mitigate the attack. This is a very valuable feature. On top of that, it's not only volumetric attack protection that the solution offers, but also layer 7 attack protection as well."
"The product is very effective and performs well on devices."
"The DDoS protection that the solution provides is its most valuable feature."
"Imperva DDoS does not provide version control."
"The solution needs to improve Integration with third parties for their on-prem deployment models. The integration is not that good yet."
"Users would benefit from better documentation. There is official documentation, but sometimes we need more detail. We have some use cases that are not so run of the mill. It would be great if there was a knowledge base that we could go to for more answers."
"It's quite expensive."
"Imperva should have more points of presence in Africa."
"Some maintenance must be performed by our IT team."
"We would like them to hire people in Sweden because it's quite hard when people are sitting in the UK or Belgium because some of the customers really want them to be local."
"The weakest point of Imperva is their first level of support, which should be improved. They should also improve the access and security logs viewing directly on the portal. I would like to see better access and security logs through the portal and not only through a SIM solution. Currently, if you want to explore your access and security logs from Imperva, you need a SIM tool or a SIM infrastructure on your side to do it. You can't do it manually or directly through the portal, which is a big problem for us. I had a call yesterday with Imperva for the roadmap, and I just told them this. They agreed that this is an improvement point from their side."
"They should add artificial intelligence to the platform. It is currently missing the machine learning piece."
"The solution is a little more pricey than other options on the market."
"It would be ideal if they could expand protocol support to cover emerging communication standards and ensure comprehensive protection against diverse attack vectors."
"There's room for improvement in the clarity of the feedback provided by the command service in the CLI."
"This product would be improved if ongoing live monitoring with dashboards were added."
"Radware DefensePro requires a continuous learning process. Using this technology, we can improve our network. Based on the different attack mechanisms, we use Radware DefensePro to provide security for our clients' networks very effectively."
"If they would go to a cloud-based approach, that would give much more flexibility in terms of working with them."
"The dashboard could be updated."
Imperva DDoS is ranked 7th in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 74 reviews while Radware DefensePro is ranked 5th in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 23 reviews. Imperva DDoS is rated 8.8, while Radware DefensePro is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Imperva DDoS writes "I like the content monitoring feature which I haven't seen in other WAF solutions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Radware DefensePro writes "Regular signature update with good reporting and analytics". Imperva DDoS is most compared with Cloudflare, Akamai, Arbor DDoS, AWS WAF and Fastly, whereas Radware DefensePro is most compared with Arbor DDoS, Cloudflare, Fortinet FortiDDoS, Check Point DDoS Protector and F5 Silverline Managed Services. See our Imperva DDoS vs. Radware DefensePro report.
See our list of best Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection vendors.
We monitor all Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.