We performed a comparison between Imperva Web Application Firewall and Indusface AppTrana based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."Compared to other web application firewalls in the market, Imperva does things in the most accurate way."
"The solution integrates seamlessly with other tools and has a good alert mechanism."
"Configuration for different application sources is most valuable. We can segregate the traffic that an application is carrying and identify the sizing in Imperva."
"Learning mode and custom policies are helpful features."
"Very intuitive and granular configuration - It does not require much time, or advanced knowledge, for configuration and maintenance."
"The most valuable features of the Imperva Web Application Firewall are performance and flexibility. We can extend or customize the box itself."
"The solution is very scalable. It is one of the most important features. You can also expand resources and features as well."
"The solution is scalable."
"We use Indusface AppTrana as a firewall."
"I am looking for more data enrichment. We should have the ability to add our own custom data to the system, to the live traffic."
"The reporting is missing some features, such as: only two export formats, and the time period does not include the last day, week, year."
"The UI interface needs improvement."
"The tool's UI is complicated. It would be best to have a more accessible UI dashboard to make the job easier."
"It would be nice to have more security control over mobile applications so I would suggest adding more mobile security features. It would also be beneficial to see improvements in regards to interface bandwidth performance, CPU time, and RAM size. Learning capability of the device is quite weak."
"It's a complicated tool to keep."
"Some of the features should be included in the next release is a file integrating monitoring tool. This feature should be improved."
"Imperva Web Application Firewall could improve the API integration. It was complex for us. Additionally, The onboarding could be better."
"The solution should add an enhanced dashboard to make it easy to navigate."
More Imperva Web Application Firewall Pricing and Cost Advice →
Imperva Web Application Firewall is ranked 6th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 47 reviews while Indusface AppTrana is ranked 26th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 1 review. Imperva Web Application Firewall is rated 8.6, while Indusface AppTrana is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Imperva Web Application Firewall writes "Offers simulation for studying infrastructure and hybrid infrastructure protection". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Indusface AppTrana writes "Cost-effective and used as an effective firewall". Imperva Web Application Firewall is most compared with AWS WAF, F5 Advanced WAF, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Fortinet FortiWeb and Azure Front Door, whereas Indusface AppTrana is most compared with F5 Advanced WAF, Azure Web Application Firewall, Cloudflare Web Application Firewall, Radware DefensePro and AWS WAF.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.