We performed a comparison between Informatica Cloud Data Integration and SAP Analytics Hub based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), MuleSoft, Matillion and others in Cloud Data Integration."Informatica Cloud Data Integration is stable."
"The most valuable feature of Informatica Cloud Data Integration is Pushback. You are able to push the data to the solution itself, and it can handle the queries. It helps us a lot. With other tools, the burden is kept on the server."
"The data mapping capability is a valuable feature."
"REST API: Excellent for scripting control and reporting mechanisms"
"It is quite easy to use and flexible."
"The serverless capability and the packaging application of the solution are valuable."
"Data synchronization tasks."
"The product improves data quality."
"What I like best about this solution is that it is built into the SAP line, making it easier to integrate with other SAP products."
"For report scheduling, I always prefer SAP because it has the most powerful scheduling features, like sending reports to more than 1,000 customers per day. That option is not as good in Microsoft BI and in Tableau it only exists as an add-on option."
"This product provides good reports using a single pane of glass."
"Data consistency is also a notable feature; the system takes care of data consistency, so you don't need to handle it manually."
"SAP Analytics Hub offers a user-friendly interface with effortless configuration, seamless updates, and real-time availability of information. It avoids the complexities associated with batch processing, providing a smooth and efficient experience."
"The integration process is not easy."
"The error information provided is not informative, as compared to Power Center."
"It needs to be a little more intuitive but it’s really not bad."
"The cloud version could be better in terms of pricing."
"The biggest challenge I see is the IDE's for the cloud and automization are different."
"The price modeling could be more flexible."
"There are a small number of UI bugs that occur on occasion."
"Performance also needs to be significantly improved, especially when connecting to SFDC for read and write operations."
"The technical support for Analytics Hub is limited and could be improved."
"Faster implementation of new functions for the new product is an area of improvement in SAP Analytics Hub."
"The analytics part of SAP has not been that good up until now. They're still in the infant stage and development is still going on. SAP has some cloud analytics and they're trying to configure it in Lumira, but it's not that good at this point."
"The interface can be simplified because it is not a user-friendly experience."
"Pricing and support are integrated into the system. However, the support process can be challenging, particularly when navigating the SAP support site, which lacks user-friendliness and ease of access."
More Informatica Cloud Data Integration Pricing and Cost Advice →
Informatica Cloud Data Integration is ranked 5th in Cloud Data Integration with 40 reviews while SAP Analytics Hub is ranked 46th in Data Integration with 6 reviews. Informatica Cloud Data Integration is rated 7.8, while SAP Analytics Hub is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Informatica Cloud Data Integration writes "A stable, scalable, and user-friendly solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Analytics Hub writes "Powerful capabilities for cross-functional reporting and dashboard creation, with real-time access". Informatica Cloud Data Integration is most compared with Informatica PowerCenter, Azure Data Factory, AWS Glue, Fivetran and IBM Cloud Pak for Data, whereas SAP Analytics Hub is most compared with SAP Analytics Cloud, Logi Analytics and Workday Prism Analytics.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.