We performed a comparison between IntelliCorp LiveCompare and OpenText ALM / Quality Center based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites."LiveCompare's Impact Analysis functionality identifies accurately what will be affected in production as the result of a change or an upgrade. It can also pinpoint accurately the scope of testing needed in anticipation of an upgrade."
"LiveCompare's unique reporting and advanced analytics streamline the entire migration process to SAP Hana, while minimizing costs, risk, and time."
"Having the links maintained within the tool is a huge boon to reporting requirements, tests, and defects."
"ALM Quality Center is a reliable, consolidated product."
"The product can scale."
"Integration with other HPE products."
"Being able to manage tests as this is something very difficult to find in other products."
"Most of the features that I like the best are more on the analytics side."
"The independent view of elevated access is good."
"The initial setup is straightforward. It's not too hard to deploy."
"From my experience with the product, I would suggest adding a feature that would allow a customer who is reviewing the LiveCompare results to be able to connect remotely with one of IntelliCorp's experts (aside from their support) in order to assist the customer to better understand the results."
"It's not intuitive in that way, which has always been a problem, especially with business users."
"I'd like to be able to improve how our QA department uses the tool, by getting better educational resources, documentation to help with competencies for my testers."
"The BPT also known as Business Process Testing can sometimes be very time intensive and sometimes might not be very intuitive to someone who is not familiar with BPT."
"Micro Focus is an expensive tool."
"The downside is that the Quality Center's only been available on Windows for years, but not on Mac."
"Client-side ActiveX with patch upgrades"
"The integration could be improved because with Agile technology you are working more quickly than with a top-down methodology."
"Cross project reporting is limited to similar database schemas"
More OpenText ALM / Quality Center Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
IntelliCorp LiveCompare is ranked 32nd in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites while OpenText ALM / Quality Center is ranked 6th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 197 reviews. IntelliCorp LiveCompare is rated 0.0, while OpenText ALM / Quality Center is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IntelliCorp LiveCompare writes "Accurately identifies what will be affected in production after a change or upgrade". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText ALM / Quality Center writes "Offers features for higher-end traceability and integration with different tools but lacks in scalability ". IntelliCorp LiveCompare is most compared with , whereas OpenText ALM / Quality Center is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, OpenText ALM Octane, Jira, Tricentis qTest and Zephyr Enterprise.
See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.