We performed a comparison between Intercept X Endpoint and Trend Vision One based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like Defender XDR's automation capabilities. XDR isn't automated by default, but you can automate it to respond. If an attack is performed anywhere within the organization, you can isolate that instance from the network. This is what I can figure out for it. When integrated with Sentinel, you can set up playbooks to automate all the alerts gathered on Sentinel from different Microsoft solutions. Sentinel has a wider range of capabilities than XDR."
"The comprehensiveness of Microsoft's threat detection is good."
"The most valuable features are spam filtering, attachment filtering, and antivirus protection."
"The solution is well integrated with applications. It is easy to maintain and administer."
"In Microsoft 365 vendor products, monitoring and connectivity across all Microsoft and third-party connectors enable viewing of all activity within those environments."
"It's a very scalable tool that can be used in a very small environment or in a very large environment. Everything can be managed from a simple dashboard and can be scaled up or down depending on the customer's environment."
"The 'Incidents and Alerts' tab is a valuable feature where we can find triggered alerts."
"Another noteworthy feature that I find appealing in Microsoft Defender is the credit-backed simulation. This feature enables organizations to train their users on effectively responding to phishing emails through a simulated training environment."
"Technical support is responsive and adept."
"The EDR (Enhanced Data Detection and Response) and the DLP (Data Loss Prevention) components are valuable assets."
"It is quite scalable. You can always add more users. I would rate the scalability a nine out of ten."
"The product efficiently prevents data leakages."
"The client isolation feature is a very effective feature."
"The deployment is quick. It just depends on the environment and what you may be replacing."
"This product integrates well with Sophos firewalls and should be seriously considered by Sophos Firewall clients."
"Scalability is good."
"The setup is fairly simple."
"I'm satisfied with the level of coverage. The policies have been very useful and detailed."
"I like Vision One's workbench. It provides helpful logs that I can search, and the telemetry is excellent because I can see what's happening during an attack or potential attack."
"XDR provided a much more deep view into what is actually happening."
"I can prevent my environment from different types of attacks based on what I see in the Vision One console."
"We had a quick deployment. The solution is easy to set up."
"Drilling down further, we can analyze how our users are utilizing their workstations, including the websites they visit."
"It helps us with investigations."
"My client would like the solution to be more customizable without using code. You can only build on the default console, but we're not allowed to change it."
"It would be helpful if the solution could scan faster when it comes to scanning attachments to emails."
"The mobile app support for Android and iOS is difficult and needs improvement."
"It would be highly beneficial if CoPilot could identify anomalies within the network and notify the IT team."
"The message trace feature for investigating mail flow issues should add more detailed information to the summary report... if they could extend the summary report a little bit, make it more descriptive, ordinary administrators could understand what happened and that the emails failed at this or that point. That way they would know the location to go to try to correct it and to prevent it from occurring again."
"Microsoft Defender XDR is not a full-fledged EDR or XDR."
"One of the biggest downsides of Microsoft products, in general, is that the menus are often difficult to find, as they tend to move from place to place between versions."
"There is no common area where we can manage all the policies for the EDR, third-party solutions, devices, servers, Windows, Mac, etc., but it's on the road map, and we ware waiting for that feature."
"It has a performance hit on a local laptop. There's an agent installed and we are bothered a lot by it because it seems to be using a lot of computer resources."
"Integration with firewall solutions could be better."
"They should keep doing what they're doing. Both of them have entered the EDR/MDR space, and they're keeping up with their competitors. I have a hard time understanding why their capabilities aren't garnering more attention."
"There are not any solutions that are a 10 out of 10. A 10 would be perfect protection with no impact on the performance of the device. This is not the case, there is some impact on the performance of the device."
"The price of this solution can be improved."
"They should work on the logs and events. Sophos Intercept X needs to increase the interface test so that it can export to a live event."
"They need to focus on their SLA or technical support. They also need to focus on their UI. They should also improve their content filtering tool and update it so that correct categories are there. Sometimes, when I want to block an online gaming website, it is not shown under the correct category. It is shown under another category. They need to review their content filtering tool on a bi-weekly or monthly basis and update the sites and categories. This will be really helpful for them."
"Stability-wise, we had issues with some clients which had to be dealt with manually. The issue was with that installation part."
"They have a DLP module in Tredn Moicros and they need to enhance its capabilities."
"The agent system is very slow, it needs to improve its performance."
"The automation capabilities on-premises could be improved, as we currently have to manually activate servers and push policies."
"I would like to have more integration with mobile device management."
"The support should be improved."
"I think that continued optimization of the environment towards automation and orchestration, a kind of layer that sits underneath all of the technologies, would be extremely important."
"The zero trust is a bit complicated compared to other parts of the solution."
"The price could be lower."
Intercept X Endpoint is ranked 4th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 101 reviews while Trend Vision One is ranked 5th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 43 reviews. Intercept X Endpoint is rated 8.4, while Trend Vision One is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Intercept X Endpoint writes "A standard offering with good threat analysis but reduces machine performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One writes "The integration of toolsets is key, enabling automation, and vendor has been tremendous partner for us". Intercept X Endpoint is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, SentinelOne Singularity Complete and Fortinet FortiClient, whereas Trend Vision One is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Trend Vision One Endpoint Security, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response. See our Intercept X Endpoint vs. Trend Vision One report.
See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors, best Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vendors, and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.